Advertisement






Click here for more guidelines.
CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home
     

J Am Coll Cardiol, 2007; 50:1844-1851, doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2007.07.053 (Published online 22 October 2007).
© 2007 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow View Online Appendix
Right arrow View CVN Interview
Right arrow View Cardiosource Slide Set
Right arrow Correction (v50,p2196)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (65)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cannon, C. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Cannon, C. P.

Safety, Tolerability, and Initial Efficacy of AZD6140, the First Reversible Oral Adenosine Diphosphate Receptor Antagonist, Compared With Clopidogrel, in Patients With Non–ST-Segment Elevation Acute Coronary Syndrome

Primary Results of the DISPERSE-2 Trial

Christopher P. Cannon, MD, FACC*,*, Steen Husted, MD{dagger},1, Robert A. Harrington, MD, FACC{ddagger},2, Benjamin M. Scirica, MD*, Håkan Emanuelsson, MD, PhD§,3, Gary Peters, MD||,4, Robert F. Storey, MD,5 for the DISPERSE-2 Investigators

* TIMI Study Group, Cardiovascular Division, Brigham and Women’s Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
{dagger} Århus University Hospital, Århus, Denmark
{ddagger} Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, North Carolina
§ AstraZeneca, Mölndal, Sweden
|| AstraZeneca, Wilmington, Delaware
University of Sheffield, Sheffield, United Kingdom.


Figure 1
View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 1 Rates of Major or Minor Bleeding Through 4 Weeks

Rates of bleeding at week 4 (primary end point, A) and overall in the trial (B). The percentages given at the top of the bar graphs are the rates of total bleeding, defined as major or minor. *Minor bleeding without major bleeding. bid = twice a day; qd = once a day.

 

Figure 2
View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 2 Rates of Major or Minor Bleeding Within 48 h of Randomization

The percentages given at the top of the bar graphs are the rates of total bleeding, defined as major or minor. *Minor bleeding without major bleeding; {dagger}loading dose. Abbreviations as in Figure 1.

 

Figure 3
View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 3 Kaplan-Meier Estimates of Clinical End Points

Cumulative risk of (A) composite clinical end point (cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, or stroke), and (B) myocardial infarction events. bid = twice a day.

 




 
  CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home

Advertisement