JACC
HOME SUBSCRIPTIONS CURRENT ISSUE PAST ISSUES CARDIOSOURCE SEARCH HELP FEEDBACK
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Am Coll Cardiol, 2007; 50:1080-1085, doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2007.05.035 (Published online 23 August 2007).
© 2007 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (2)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Askew, J. W.
Right arrow Articles by Gibbons, R. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Askew, J. W.
Right arrow Articles by Gibbons, R. J.

The Value of Myocardial Perfusion Single-Photon Emission Computed Tomography in Screening Asymptomatic Patients With Atrial Fibrillation for Coronary Artery Disease

J. Wells Askew, MD*,*, Todd D. Miller, MD, FACC*,1, David O. Hodge, MS{dagger} and Raymond J. Gibbons, MD, FACC*,2

* Division of Cardiovascular Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic and Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, Minnesota
{dagger} Division of Biostatistics, Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic and Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, Minnesota.


Figure 1
View larger version (6K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 1 Summed Stress Score Results in Patients With and Without Atrial Fibrillation

Solid bars = atrial fibrillation patients; open bars = non-atrial fibrillation patients. *The p value for mean SSS between patients with and without atrial fibrillation (p = 0.35). SSS = summed stress score.

 

Figure 2
View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 2 Percentage of High-Risk SSS by Clinical Risk Groups

(A) Atrial fibrillation patients; (B) non-atrial fibrillation patients. SSS = summed stress score.

 

Figure 3
View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 3 Kaplan-Meier Survival Curves According to Summed Stress Score Risk Categories

Kaplan-Meier estimates for overall survival in atrial fibrillation (AF) patients (A) and non-AF patients (B) according to summed stress score (SSS) risk categories. Survival difference was statistically significant in both AF and non-AF patients (p < 0.001 by log rank statistic). Numbers below the graphs indicate numbers of patients available for analysis at given time points.

 

Figure 4
View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 4 Kaplan-Meier Survival Curves

Kaplan-Meier estimates for overall survival in atrial fibrillation (AF) and non-AF patients. Differences between survival curves were statistically significant (p < 0.001 by log rank statistic). Numbers below the graph indicate numbers of patients available for analysis at given time points.

 

Figure 5
View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 5 Relationship of Summed Stress Score and Mortality in the Presence of Atrial Fibrillation

Kaplan-Meier estimates for overall survival in atrial fibrillation (AF) and non-AF patients according to low-/intermediate-risk summed stress score (SSS) and high-risk SSS. Differences between the survival curves of the low-/intermediate-risk SSS AF and non-AF groups as well as between the high-risk SSS AF and non-AF groups were statistically significant (p < 0.001 by log rank statistic for the curves as shown). Numbers below the graph indicate numbers of patients available for analysis at given time points.

 





HOME SUBSCRIPTIONS CURRENT ISSUE PAST ISSUES CARDIOSOURCE SEARCH HELP FEEDBACK
Copyright © 2007 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation.