Advertisement






Click here for more guidelines.
CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home
     

J Am Coll Cardiol, 2007; 49:849-854, doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2006.10.054 (Published online 8 February 2007).
© 2007 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (4)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Shishehbor, M. H.
Right arrow Articles by Bhatt, D. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Shishehbor, M. H.
Right arrow Articles by Bhatt, D. L.

In Unstable Angina or Non–ST-Segment Acute Coronary Syndrome, Should Patients With Multivessel Coronary Artery Disease Undergo Multivessel or Culprit-Only Stenting?

Mehdi H. Shishehbor, DO, MPH*,1, Michael S. Lauer, MD, FACC*, Inder M. Singh, MD, MS{dagger}, Derek P. Chew, MBBS, MPH{ddagger}, Juhana Karha, MD*, Sorin J. Brener, MD, FACC*, David J. Moliterno, MD, FACC§,2, Stephen G. Ellis, MD, FACC*, Eric J. Topol, MD, FACC|| and Deepak L. Bhatt, MD, FACC*,3,*

* Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
{dagger} Department of Internal Medicine, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
{ddagger} Department of Cardiology, Flinders Medical Center, South Australia, Australia
§ Gill Heart Institute and Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky
|| Department of Genetics, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio


Figure 1
View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 1 Kaplan-Meier Curves for Patients Undergoing Multivessel Versus Culprit-Only Stenting

(A) Kaplan-Meier curves for the composite end point of death, myocardial infarction (MI), or revascularization for patients undergoing multivessel versus culprit-only stenting (n = 1,240). (B) Kaplan-Meier curves for the composite end point of death or MI for patients undergoing multivessel versus culprit-only stenting (n = 1,240). (C) Kaplan-Meier mortality curves for patients undergoing multivessel versus culprit-only stenting (n = 1,240). (D) Kaplan-Meier curves for revascularization for patients undergoing multivessel versus culprit-only stenting (n = 1,240).

 

Figure 2
View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 2 Kaplan-Meier Curves for Propensity-Matched Patients Undergoing Multivessel Versus Culprit-Only Stenting

(A) Kaplan-Meier curves for the composite end point of death, myocardial infarction (MI), or revascularization for propensity-matched patients undergoing multivessel versus culprit-only stenting (n = 630). (B) Kaplan-Meier curves for the composite end point of death or MI for propensity-matched patients undergoing multivessel versus culprit-only stenting (n = 630). (C) Kaplan-Meier mortality curves for propensity-matched patients undergoing multivessel versus culprit-only stenting (n = 630). (D) Kaplan-Meier curves for revascularization for propensity-matched patients undergoing multivessel versus culprit-only stenting (n = 630).

 




 
  CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home

Advertisement