JACC
HOME SUBSCRIPTIONS CURRENT ISSUE PAST ISSUES CARDIOSOURCE SEARCH HELP FEEDBACK
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Am Coll Cardiol, 2007; 49:2061-2069, doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2007.03.008 (Published online 3 May 2007).
© 2007 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Scheinman, M. M.
Right arrow Articles by Keung, E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Scheinman, M. M.
Right arrow Articles by Keung, E.

The Year in Clinical Cardiac Electrophysiology

Melvin M. Scheinman, MD, FACC*,* and Edmund Keung, MD{dagger}

* Section of Cardiac Electrophysiology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California
{dagger} Veterans Affairs Medical Center, San Francisco, California.


Figure 1
View larger version (28K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 1 Pathogeneses of the Brugada Pattern

(A) A normal surface V2 recording together with endocardial (Endo), midmyocardial (M), and epicardial (Epi) action potential (AP) recordings. (B) The development of a transmural voltage gradient between epicardium and endocardium, giving rise to a saddleback configuration in V2 (type II Brugada pattern). (C) Further transmural voltage changes producing a coved pattern in V2 (type I pattern). (D) Loss of the dome in the epicardial recording and enhanced coved pattern in V2. (E) Potential differences between polarized and adjacent depolarized cells may lead to re-entry (phase 2). ECG = electrocardiogram. Reprinted with permission from Antzelevitch (4).

 

Figure 2
View larger version (38K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 2 Terfenadine Induces Brugada Phenotype More Readily in Male Than Female RV Wedge Preparations

Each panel shows action potentials recorded from 2 epicardial sites and 1 endocardial site, together with a transmural electrocardiogram. Control recordings were obtained at a basic cycle length (BCL) of 2,000 ms, whereas terfenadine data were recorded at a BCL of 800 ms after a brief period of pacing at a BCL of 400 ms. (A) Terfenadine (5 µM)-induced, heterogeneous loss of action potential dome, ST-segment elevation, and phase 2 re-entry (arrow) in a male right ventricular (RV) wedge preparation. (B) Terfenadine fails to induce Brugada phenotype in a female RV wedge preparation. (C) Polymorphic VT triggered by spontaneous phase 2 re-entry in a male preparation. (D) Incidence of phase 2 re-entry in male (6 of 7) versus female (2 of 7) RV wedge preparations when perfused with 5 µM terfenadine for up to 2 h. Abbreviations as in Figure 1. Modified with permission from Antzelevitch (4).

 





HOME SUBSCRIPTIONS CURRENT ISSUE PAST ISSUES CARDIOSOURCE SEARCH HELP FEEDBACK
Copyright © 2007 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation.