Advertisement






Click here for more guidelines.
CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home
     

J Am Coll Cardiol, 2006; 48:1208-1214, doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2006.04.094 (Published online 25 August 2006).
© 2006 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (8)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Nichols, W. W.
Right arrow Articles by Conti, C. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Nichols, W. W.
Right arrow Articles by Conti, C. R.
Related Collections
Right arrowRelated Article

Enhanced External Counterpulsation Treatment Improves Arterial Wall Properties and Wave Reflection Characteristics in Patients With Refractory Angina

Wilmer W. Nichols, PhD*, Juan C. Estrada, MD, Randy W. Braith, PhD, Karen Owens, LRN and C. Richard Conti, MD, MACC

Department of Medicine/Cardiology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, Florida.


Figure 1
View larger version (8K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 1 The early part of the ascending aortic pressure wave, with amplitude (Pi – Pd), is generated by the left ventricular (LV) ejection (flow) wave. This forward-traveling pressure wave is dependent upon central (elastic) arterial stiffness and pulse wave velocity (PWV) and is not influenced by wave reflections. The later part of the pressure wave, with amplitude (Ps – Pi), is generated by the reflected wave arriving from the lower body during systole and adding to the forward pressure wave. This wave is dependent upon the elastic properties of the entire arterial tree and PWV. Pulse pressure = (Pi – Pd) + (Ps – Pi) = (Ps – Pd), and augmentation index (AIa) = (Ps – Pi)/(Ps – Pd). AIa is dependent on the elastic properties of the entire arterial tree, transmission velocity of the reflected wave, and distance to the major reflecting site. {Delta}tp is inversely related to arterial stiffness and is the round-trip travel time of the pressure wave from the heart to the periphery and back; {Delta}tr is the systolic duration of the reflected wave. Wasted LV pressure energy (2.09 {Delta}tr[Ps – Pi]) and tension-time-index (area under the systolic portion of the pressure wave) are measures of myocardial oxygen demand. The broken curve is the pressure or flow wave without reflections.

 

Figure 2
View larger version (31K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 2 Noninvasive recordings of radial artery pressures waves (left) and synthesized aortic pressure waves (right) before and after EECP treatment in a 58-year-old woman with stable refractory angina. Arrows on the radial pressure wave denote the beginning of the reflected wave, and those on the aortic pressure wave denote the beginning and peak of the reflected wave.

 

Figure 3
View larger version (23K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 3 Effects of enhanced external counterpulsation (EECP) treatment on indices of estimated arterial pulse wave velocity and arterial stiffness. EECP caused an increase in travel time of the reflected wave, {Delta}tp/2, from 68 ± 8.0 ms to 74 ± 6.6 ms (p < 0.001) and a decrease in augmentation index (AIa) from 27 ± 10% to 19 ± 10% (p < 0.001).

 

Figure 4
View larger version (23K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 4 Effects of enhanced external counterpulsation (EECP) treatment on indices of estimated myocardial oxygen demand. EECP caused a decrease in tension-time index (TTI) from 23 ± 5.1 x 102 units to 19 ± 3.9 x 102 units (p < 0.001) and a decrease in wasted LV energy from 56 ± 16 x 102 dyne-s-cm–2 to 36 ± 13 x 102 dyne-s-cm–2 (p < 0.001).

 




 
  CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home

Advertisement