JACC
HOME SUBSCRIPTIONS CURRENT ISSUE PAST ISSUES CARDIOSOURCE SEARCH HELP FEEDBACK
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

J Am Coll Cardiol, 2006; 48:948-953, doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2005.11.094 (Published online 14 August 2006).
© 2006 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (8)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pereira, A. C.
Right arrow Articles by Hueb, W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Pereira, A. C.
Right arrow Articles by Hueb, W.
Related Collections
Right arrowRelated Article

Clinical Judgment and Treatment Options in Stable Multivessel Coronary Artery Disease

Results From the One-Year Follow-Up of the MASS II (Medicine, Angioplasty, or Surgery Study II)

Alexandre C. Pereira, MD*, Neuza H.M. Lopes, MD, PhD, Paulo R. Soares, MD, PhD, Jose Eduardo Krieger, MD, PhD, Sergio A. de Oliveira, MD, PhD, Luiz A.M. Cesar, MD, PhD, Jose A.F. Ramires, MD, PhD and Whady Hueb, MD, PhD

Heart Institute (InCor), University of São Paulo Medical School, São Paulo, Brazil.


Figure 1
View larger version (20K):

[in a new window]
  		Figure 1 Kaplan-Meier curves of concordant and discordant patients and combined end points (A) or recurrent ischemia requiring revascularization (B) after 1-year follow-up.

 

Figure 2
View larger version (13K):

[in a new window]
  		Figure 2 Kaplan-Meier curves of concordant and discordant patients and combined end points. (A) Percutaneous coronary intervention subgroup. (B) Coronary artery bypass graft subgroup. (C) Medical treatment subgroup.

 

Figure 3
View larger version (24K):

[in a new window]
  		Figure 3 A 3 x 3 table of 1-year probabilities of event-free survival. Note the decreased survival of discordant percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI)-treated patients, i.e., individuals randomized to PCI whose clinician’s first choice would be toward coronary artery bypass graft (CABG, 61.7) or medical treatment (69.8). White boxes = concordant patients; blue boxes = discordant patients.

 

Figure 4
View larger version (12K):

[in a new window]
  		Figure 4 Combined end points incident in individuals with a clinical decision in favor of PCI (A) and individuals with a clinical decision in favor of medical or CABG treatment (B). Abbreviations as in Figure 3.

 




HOME SUBSCRIPTIONS CURRENT ISSUE PAST ISSUES CARDIOSOURCE SEARCH HELP FEEDBACK
Copyright © 2006 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation.