cardiology careers collections past issues search home
     

J Am Coll Cardiol, 2006; 48:276-280, doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2006.02.067 (Published online 19 June 2006).
© 2006 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gyenes, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Gyenes, G.

The Prognostic Importance of Nonsignificant Left Main Coronary Artery Disease in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

Gabor Gyenes, MD, PhD*,*, Fiona M. Shrive, BSc{dagger}, Michelle M. Graham, MD, FRCP(C)*, William A. Ghali, MD, FRCP(C){dagger}, Merrill L. Knudtson, MD, FCRP(C){dagger} for the APPROACH Investigators1

* University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
{dagger} University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.


Figure 1
View larger version (11K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 1 Seven-year crude survival of percutaneous coronary intervention patients with no left main coronary artery disease (LMCAD) versus percutaneous coronary intervention patients with "nonsignificant" (i.e., <50%) LMCAD. Thin line = no LMCAD; thick line = LMCAD <50%.

 

Figure 2
View larger version (11K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 2 Seven-year risk-adjusted survival of percutaneous coronary intervention patients with no left main coronary artery (LMCAD) disease versus percutaneous coronary intervention patients with <50% LMCAD. Solid line = LMCAD <50%; dashed line = no LMCAD.

 




 
  cardiology careers collections past issues search home