Advertisement






Click here for more guidelines.
CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home
     

J Am Coll Cardiol, 2006; 48:2524-2530, doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2006.02.079 (Published online 28 November 2006).
© 2006 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (18)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pepi, M.
Right arrow Articles by Alamanni, F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Pepi, M.
Right arrow Articles by Alamanni, F.

Head-to-Head Comparison of Two- and Three-Dimensional Transthoracic and Transesophageal Echocardiography in the Localization of Mitral Valve Prolapse

Mauro Pepi, MD*, Gloria Tamborini, MD, Anna Maltagliati, MD, Claudia Agnese Galli, MD, Erminio Sisillo, MD, Luca Salvi, MD, Moreno Naliato, MD, Massimo Porqueddu, MD, Alessandro Parolari, MD, Marco Zanobini, MD and Francesco Alamanni, MD

Centro Cardiologico Monzino, IRCCS, Department of Cardiology and Cardiac Surgery, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.


Figure 1
View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 1 Overall accuracy of the 4 techniques in the identification of mitral valve pathology. *p < 0.001 versus 2D TTE; {dagger}p < 0.001 versus 3D TTE; §p < 0.001 versus 2D TEE. 2D = two-dimensional; 3D = three-dimensional; TEE = transesophageal echocardiography; TTE = transthoracic echocardiography.

 

Figure 2
View larger version (103K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 2 Four examples of prolapses of different scallops (arrows) of the mitral valve correctly identified by 3D TTE and 3D TEE. Each of the 4 panels shows head-to-head comparison of 3D TTE (left side) and 3D TEE (right side) techniques by imaging the valve in the surgical view (from the left atrium). (A) P1 prolapse; (B) P2 prolapse; (C) P3 prolapse; (D) A2 prolapse. AO = aorta; other abbreviations as in Figure 1.

 

Figure 3
View larger version (186K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 3 Example of a patient with a complex bileaflet mitral valve prolapse in whom 3D TTE (A) allowed a non-complete definition of the pathology, whereas 3D TEE (B and C) correctly identified the prolapse of P1, A2, and A3. (D) Shows in an oblique surgical view involvement of the anterior (A2, A3, arrows) and of the posterior (P1, dashed arrow) scallops. TV = tricuspid valve; other abbreviations as in Figures 1 and 2.

 

Figure 4
View larger version (63K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 4 Examples of chordal rupture (arrows) associated with mitral valve prolapse. (A) 3D TTE reconstruction from the apical windows. (B) Surgical view (from the left atrium) and (C) longitudinal view in a 3D TEE reconstruction of mitral valve. LA = left atrium; LV = left ventricle; other abbreviations as in Figure 1.

 




 
  CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home

Advertisement