Advertisement






Click here for more guidelines.
CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home
     

J Am Coll Cardiol, 2006; 47:1828-1834, doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2005.12.049 (Published online 11 April 2006).
© 2006 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Castro Hevia, J.
Right arrow Articles by Fayad Rodríguez, Y.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Castro Hevia, J.
Right arrow Articles by Fayad Rodríguez, Y.

Tpeak-Tend and Tpeak-Tend Dispersion as Risk Factors for Ventricular Tachycardia/Ventricular Fibrillation in Patients With the Brugada Syndrome

Jesus Castro Hevia, MD*, Charles Antzelevitch, PhD, FACC{dagger},*, Francisco Tornés Bárzaga, MD*, Margarita Dorantes Sánchez, MD*, Francisco Dorticós Balea, PhD*, Roberto Zayas Molina, MD*, Miguel A. Quiñones Pérez, MD* and Yanela Fayad Rodríguez, MD*

* Arrhythmia Unit, Cardiovascular Surgery and Cardiology Institute, Havana, Cuba
{dagger} Masonic Medical Research Laboratory, Utica, New York.


Figure 1
View larger version (39K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 1 Precordial leads of the electrocardiogram (ECG) of a patient with the Brugada syndrome with recurrences (A), a Brugada-type ECG (B), and a control case (C). Numbers depict measured values for QT, QTpeak (QTp) and Tpeak-Tend interval (Tp-e). All values are in ms. T waves <1.5 mm were not measured.

 

Figure 2
View larger version (20K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 2 Kaplan-Meier analysis of arrhythmic events during follow-up depending on Tpeak-Tend interval (Tp-e) ≥100 ms or Tp-e <100 ms.

 

Figure 3
View larger version (24K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 3 Tpeak-Tend interval (Tp-e) receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve. The cut point that better optimizes the values of sensibility and specificity are for values ≥100 ms.

 

Figure 4
View larger version (22K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 4 Kaplan-Meier analysis of arrhythmic events during follow-up depending on Tpeak-Tend interval (Tp-e) dispersion >20 ms or Tp-e dispersion ≤20 ms.

 

Figure 5
View larger version (26K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 5 Tpeak-Tend interval (Tp-e) dispersion receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve. The cut point that better optimizes the values of sensibility and specificity are for values >20 ms.

 




 
  CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home

Advertisement