Advertisement






Click here for more guidelines.
CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home
     

J Am Coll Cardiol, 2006; 47:769-773, doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2005.09.053 (Published online 27 January 2006).
© 2006 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Correction (v47,p1739)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Vyas, A. K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Vyas, A. K.

Reduction in Ventricular Tachyarrhythmias With Statins in the Multicenter Automatic Defibrillator Implantation Trial (MADIT)-II

Anant K. Vyas, MD, MPH*,*, Hongsheng Guo, MD{ddagger}, Arthur J. Moss, MD*, Brian Olshansky, MD§, Scott A. McNitt, MS*, W. Jackson Hall, PhD{dagger}, Wojciech Zareba, MD, PhD*, Jonathan S. Steinberg, MD||, Avi Fischer, MD||, Jeremy Ruskin, MD, Mark L. Andrews, BBA* for the MADIT-II Research Group

* Heart Research Follow-up Program of the Cardiology Unit of the Department of Medicine, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York
{dagger} Department of Biostatistics and Computational Biology, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York
{ddagger} Cardiac Electrophysiology Division, Park Nicollet Clinic, St. Louis Park, Minnesota
§ University of Iowa Hospitals, Iowa City, Iowa
|| Cardiology Division of the Department of Medicine, St. Luke’s Roosevelt Hospital Center and Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, New York
Cardiology Division of the Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard University, Boston, Massachusetts.


Figure 1
View larger version (15K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 1 Frequency distribution of the percentage of days during follow-up on which the implantable cardioverter-defibrillator treated patients (n = 654) received statin drugs.

 

Figure 2
View larger version (22K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 2 (A) Cumulative probability of appropriate implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) therapy for cardiac death or ventricular tachycardia/ventricular fibrillation (VT/VF) by percentage of days that statin therapy was used (≥90%, 11% to 89%, and ≤10%) during follow-up. Numbers below each graph are the number of patients at risk in the time period; the p value assesses differences among the three curves. (B) Cumulative probability of appropriate ICD therapy for VT/VF by percentage of days that statin therapy was used (≥90%, 11% to 89%, and ≤10%) during follow-up. Numbers below each graph are the number of patients at risk in the time period; the p value assesses differences among the three curves.

 

Figure 3
View larger version (20K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 3 (A) Cumulative probability of death classified as sudden cardiac, by percentage of days that statin therapy was used (≥90%, 11% to 89%, and ≤10%) during follow-up. Numbers below each graph are the number of patients at risk in the time period; the p value assesses differences among the three curves. (B) Cumulative probability of death classified as non-sudden cardiac, by percentage of days that statin therapy was used (≥90%, 11% to 89%, and ≤10%) during follow-up. Numbers below each graph are the number of patients at risk in the time period; the p value assesses differences among the three curves.

 




 
  CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home

Advertisement