Advertisement






Click here for more guidelines.
CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home
     

J Am Coll Cardiol, 2006; 47:2390-2396, doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2006.01.076 (Published online 25 May 2006).
© 2006 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (12)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Clark, D. J.
Right arrow Articles by Rosenfield, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Clark, D. J.
Right arrow Articles by Rosenfield, K.

Mechanisms and Predictors of Carotid Artery Stent Restenosis

A Serial Intravascular Ultrasound Study

David J. Clark, MD*,{dagger}, Sara Lessio, MD*,1, Margaret O’Donoghue, MD*, Con Tsalamandris, MD{dagger}, Robert Schainfeld, DO* and Kenneth Rosenfield, MD, FACC*,*

* Division of Cardiovascular Medicine and Research, St. Elizabeth’s Medical Center of Boston, Boston, Massachusetts
{dagger} Departments of Cardiology and Medicine, Austin Hospital, Melbourne, Australia.


Figure 1
View larger version (86K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 1 Designated sites of quantitative carotid angiography (QCA) and intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) measurements. QCA: (A) before intervention; (B) post-carotid stent deployment; (C) six-month follow-up. (D) IVUS: (Top) calcified plaque at lesion site pre-intervention; (Bottom) internal carotid artery (ICA) stent post-procedure. 1 = distal ICA reference; 2 = lesion site; 3 = proximal common carotid artery (CCA) reference; 4 = lesion site in-stent; 5 = ICA stent minimal luminal diameter (MLD); 6 = ICA stent reference site; 7 = CCA stent MLD; 8 = CCA stent reference site; 9 = lumen MLD (line) and lumen area (circle); 10 = stent MLD (line) and stent area (circle).

 

Figure 2
View larger version (23K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 2 Quantitative intravascular ultrasound assessment (mean ± SD) of late stent enlargement ({Delta} stent), neointimal hyperplasia area (NIH), and late lumen loss ({Delta} lumen) at designated sites of the internal carotid artery (ICA) and common carotid artery (CCA) stent. (Top) Absolute changes (mm2). (Bottom) Percentage change (%). The p values refer to a comparison of changes amongst different segments of the stent. Solid bars = ICA lesion site; open bars = reference site ICA stent; gray bars = minimal lumen diameter CCA stent; ruled bars = reference site CCA stent. *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001.

 

Figure 3
View larger version (24K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 3 Correlation between amount of neointimal hyperplasia (NIH, mm2) and late stent enlargement ({Delta} stent, mm2) at the internal carotid artery lesion site (r = 0.64; p < 0.001).

 

Figure 4
View larger version (19K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 4 (Left) Correlation between the immediate post-procedure distal internal carotid artery (ICA) reference vessel diameter (mm) measured by quantitative carotid angiography (QCA) and percentage restenotic area after six months. (Right) Correlation between the immediate post-procedure ICA stent minimal lumen diameter (MLD) (mm) measured by QCA and percentage restenotic area after six months.

 




 
  CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home

Advertisement