Advertisement






Click here for more guidelines.
CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home
     

J Am Coll Cardiol, 2006; 47:2296-2302, doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2005.11.088
© 2006 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Zoghbi, G. J.
Right arrow Articles by Iskandrian, A. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Zoghbi, G. J.
Right arrow Articles by Iskandrian, A. E.

Effect of Caffeine on Ischemia Detection by Adenosine Single-Photon Emission Computed Tomography Perfusion Imaging

Gilbert J. Zoghbi, MD, FACC*,{dagger},*, Thien Htay, MD{ddagger}, Raed Aqel, MD, FACC*,{dagger}, Linda Blackmon, RN*, Jaekyeong Heo, MD, FACC* and Ami E. Iskandrian, MD, FACC, FAHA*

* Division of Cardiovascular Disease, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama
{dagger} Birmingham Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Birmingham, Alabama
{ddagger} University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California


Figure 1
View larger version (11K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 1 Distribution of caffeine levels among 29 patients.

 

Figure 2
View larger version (13K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 2 Scatter plot of the summed difference score (SDS) before and after caffeine.

 

Figure 3
View larger version (13K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 3 (A) Scatter plot of percent total defect size with (Caffeine +) and without (Caffeine –) caffeine. (B) Bland-Altman plot of the difference of the percent total defect sizes between the study with caffeine (Caffeine +) and the study without caffeine (Caffeine –) versus average percent total defect size. The data are compatible with the hypothesis that the mean Caffeine (+) and Caffeine (–) percent defect size difference is 0 (t test p value = 0.61). For percent defect size, the empirical variance of within-patient differences is 2.46%, which for n = 30 yields a 95% confidence interval for the mean difference with half-width <1% (0.92%).

 

Figure 4
View larger version (24K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 4 Perfusion defect size before (top panel) and after (bottom panel) caffeine stratified by caffeine levels.

 

Figure 5
View larger version (51K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 5 Polar map showing a perfusion defect before (Caffeine –) and after caffeine (Caffeine +). A 53-year-old white woman with diabetes mellitus, hypertension, dyslipidemia, and a history of moderate coronary artery disease underwent adenosine single-photon emission computed tomography for evaluation of chest pain. The baseline and caffeine study showed two-vessel ischemia with no significant difference in extent and severity of the defect between the two studies (caffeine blood level 2 mg/l). LAD = left anterior descending coronary artery; LCX = left circumflex coronary artery; RCA = right coronary artery; TOT = total.

 




 
  CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home

Advertisement