Drug-Eluting Stents in the Treatment of Intermediate Lesions
Pooled Analysis From Four Randomized Trials
Jeffrey W. Moses, MD, FACC*,1,*,
Gregg W. Stone, MD, FACC*,2,
Eugenia Nikolsky, MD, PhD, FACC*,
Gary S. Mintz, MD, FACC*,
George Dangas, MD, PhD, FACC*,
Eberhard Grube, MD
,
Stephen G. Ellis, MD, FACC
,3,
Alexandra J. Lansky, MD, FACC*,
Giora Weisz, MD*,
Martin Fahy, MSc*,
Yingbo Na, MSc*,
Mary E. Russell, MD, FACC
,4,
Dennis Donohoe, MD||,5,
Martin B. Leon, MD, FACC*,6 and
Roxana Mehran, MD, FACC*
* Columbia University Medical Center and the Cardiovascular Research Foundation, New York, New York
Heart-Center Siegburg, Siegburg, Germany
Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio
Boston Scientific Corp, Natick, Massachusetts
|| Cordis Corp., Warren, New Jersey

View larger version (13K):
[in a new window]
|
Figure 1 One-year survival free from major adverse cardiac events (MACE) of patients with intermediate lesions randomized to drug-eluting stents (DES) versus bare-metal stents (BMS). MI = myocardial infarction; TVR = target vessel revascularization.
|
|

View larger version (18K):
[in a new window]
|
Figure 2 Rates of major adverse cardiac events (MACE) in patients with intermediate lesions in studies in which intervention was deferred based on physiologic lesion assessment (fractional flow reserve 0.75) or intravascular ultrasound analysis (minimal cross-sectional area >4.0 mm2) (711) vs. the current pooled analysis of drug-eluting stent (DES)-treated patients from four randomized trials.
|
|
Copyright © 2006 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation.