cardiology careers collections past issues search home
     

J Am Coll Cardiol, 2006; 47:2049-2056, doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2006.01.057 (Published online 20 April 2006).
© 2006 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow View Online Appendix
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (77)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Barst, R. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Barst, R. J.

Treatment of Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension With the Selective Endothelin-A Receptor Antagonist Sitaxsentan

Robyn J. Barst, MD*,1,*, David Langleben, MD{dagger},1, David Badesch, MD{ddagger},1, Adaani Frost, MD§,1, E. Clinton Lawrence, MD||,1, Shelley Shapiro, MD,1, Robert Naeije, MD#,1, Nazzareno Galie, MD**,1 on behalf of the STRIDE-2 Study Group

* Department of Pediatrics, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York
{dagger} Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
{ddagger} University of Colorado, Denver, Colorado
§ Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
|| McKelvey Lung Transplantation Center, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia
University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California
# Erasmus University, Brussels, Belgium
** Institute of Cardiology, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.


Figure 1
View larger version (23K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 1 Patient disposition. BID = twice a day; OL = open label; QD = once daily.

 

Figure 2
View larger version (13K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 2 Mean (±SE) change in six-min walk (6MW) distance from baseline to week 18 in the placebo, sitaxsentan 50-mg, sitaxsentan 100-mg, and open label (OL) bosentan groups. *p = 0.03 (95% confidence interval 5.37, 57.44) for comparison between the 100-mg dose of sitaxsentan and placebo, **p = 0.05 for OL bosentan vs. placebo, and p = 0.07 for 50-mg sitaxsentan vs. placebo.

 

Figure 3
View larger version (40K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 3 Change in World Health Organization functional class from baseline to week 18 in the placebo, sitaxsentan 50-mg, sitaxsentan 100-mg, and open label (OL) bosentan groups. *p = 0.04 for comparison between the 100-mg dose of sitaxsentan and placebo; there was no difference for either the sitaxsentan 50-mg group or the OL bosentan group vs. placebo. BL = baseline.

 




 
  cardiology careers collections past issues search home