Advertisement






Click here for more guidelines.
CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home
     

J Am Coll Cardiol, 2005; 46:1712-1720, doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2005.05.088 (Published online 7 October 2005).
© 2005 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (31)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Singh, J. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Singh, J. P.

Factors Influencing Appropriate Firing of the Implanted Defibrillator for Ventricular Tachycardia/Fibrillation

Findings From the Multicenter Automatic Defibrillator Implantation Trial II (MADIT-II)

Jagmeet P. Singh, MD, PhD*,*, W. Jackson Hall, PhD{dagger}, Scott McNitt, MS{ddagger}, Hongyue Wang, MA{dagger}, James P. Daubert, MD{ddagger}, Wojciech Zareba, MD{ddagger}, Jeremy N. Ruskin, MD*, Arthur J. Moss, MD{ddagger} and the MADIT-II Investigators

* Cardiac Arrhythmia Service, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
{dagger} Department of Biostatistics and Computational Biology, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York
{ddagger} Cardiology Unit, Department of Medicine, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York



View larger version (22K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 1 Kaplan-Meier curves for the probability of receiving appropriate implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) therapy in patients after interim hospitalization for congestive heart failure (CHF) (Post CHF) compared with a period before any such hospitalization (Pre CHF). Panels A and B show the curves for combined ventricular tachycardia (VT) and ventricular fibrillation (VF) (with censoring at death), and for combined VT, VF, and death, respectively.

 


View larger version (22K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 2 Kaplan-Meier curves for the probability of receiving appropriate implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) therapy in patients after interim hospitalization for coronary events (Post IH-CE) compared with the period before any such hospitalization (Pre IH-CE). Panels A and B show the curves for combined ventricular tachycardia (VT) and ventricular fibrillation (VF) (with censoring at death), and for combined VT, VF, and death, respectively.

 


View larger version (22K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 3 Kaplan-Meier curves for receiving implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) therapy in patients after interim hospitalization for heart failure (Post CHF) in patients sub-stratified by New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class. Panel A shows that patients with NYHA class ≤II have a higher propensity to receive ICD therapy after hospitalization, as opposed to an absence of this effect in patients with NYHA class III or IV function (B). Other abbreviations as in Figures 1 and 2.

 




 
  CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home

Advertisement