cardiology careers collections past issues search home
     

J Am Coll Cardiol, 2005; 46:497-504, doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2005.02.091
© 2005 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (37)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Adams, K. F.
Right arrow Articles by Gheorghiade, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Adams, K. F., Jr
Right arrow Articles by Gheorghiade, M.
Related Collections
Right arrowRelated Article

Relationship of Serum Digoxin Concentration to Mortality and Morbidity in Women in the Digitalis Investigation Group Trial

A Retrospective Analysis

Kirkwood F. Adams, Jr, MD, FACC*,*, J. Herbert Patterson, PharmD{dagger}, Wendy A. Gattis, PharmD§, Christopher M. O’Connor, MD, FACC§, Craig R. Lee, PharmD{dagger}, Todd A. Schwartz, DrPH{ddagger} and Mihai Gheorghiade, MD, FACC||

* Department of Medicine and Radiology, School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
{dagger} School of Pharmacy, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
{ddagger} Department of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
§ Department of Medicine, Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina
|| Department of Medicine, Northwestern University Medical School, Chicago, Illinois.



View larger version (30K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 1 Diagram that shows the relationship between the original study population in the Digoxin Investigation Group (DIG) trial and the patients analyzed in the present study. LVEF = left ventricular ejection fraction.

 


View larger version (26K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 2 Plot of the adjusted point estimates and 95% confidence intervals of women and men for the hazard ratio for death on digoxin versus placebo at various serum digoxin concentrations (ng/ml) with concentration modeled as a continuous variable. The 95% confidence intervals for the women are offset to allow better depiction of results.

 


View larger version (19K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 3 Plot of adjusted survival curves in placebo and various digoxin serum concentration groups. Results from this categorical analysis demonstrated that women with serum concentrations from 0.5 to 0.9 ng/ml had similar survival compared with those receiving placebo (hazard ratio 0.81, with 95% confidence interval from 0.58 to 1.14, p = 0.229), whereas women with serum concentrations from 1.2 to 2.0 ng/ml seemed to have a worse outcome (hazard ratio 1.11, with 95% confidence interval from 0.78 to 1.60, p = 0.557). SDC = serum digoxin concentration.

 


View larger version (28K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 4 Plot of the adjusted point estimates and 95% confidence intervals of women and men for the hazard ratio for the combined study end point (of all-cause mortality or first hospitalization due to worsening heart failure) on digoxin versus placebo at various serum digoxin concentrations (ng/ml) with concentration modeled as a continuous variable. The 95% confidence intervals for the women are offset to allow better depiction of results.

 




 
  cardiology careers collections past issues search home