JACC
HOME SUBSCRIPTIONS CURRENT ISSUE PAST ISSUES CARDIOSOURCE SEARCH HELP FEEDBACK
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Am Coll Cardiol, 2005; 46:2215-2222, doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2005.08.047
© 2005 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (9)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Zwanenburg, J. J.M.
Right arrow Articles by van Rossum, A. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Zwanenburg, J. J.M.
Right arrow Articles by van Rossum, A. C.

Propagation of Onset and PeakTime of Myocardial Shortening in Time of Myocardial Shortening in Ischemic Versus Nonischemic Cardiomyopathy

Assessment by Magnetic Resonance Imaging Myocardial Tagging

Jaco J.M. Zwanenburg, MSc*,*, Marco J.W. Götte, MD, PhD{dagger},{ddagger}, J. Tim Marcus, PhD*, Joost P.A. Kuijer, PhD*, Paul Knaapen, MD{dagger}, Robert M. Heethaar, PhD* and Albert C. van Rossum, MD, PhD{dagger}

* Department of Physics and Medical Technology, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
{dagger} Department of Cardiology, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
{ddagger} Department of Cardiology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands



View larger version (197K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 1 Example tagging images for a patient (top) and a healthy subject (bottom). Early shortening occurs in the septum of the patient (left), whereas this shortening is not preserved at aortic valve closure (end-systole, right).

 


View larger version (18K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 2 Example circumferential strain curves over time for one septal segment and one lateral segment of a mid ventricular slice, showing the definitions of the several timing parameters. (A) Healthy subject, showing synchronous shortening. (B) Nonischemic patient with multiple shortening waves in the septum, leading to a first peak and a maximum peak of shortening. AL = anterolateral; AS = anteroseptal; ECG = electrocardiogram; IL = inferolateral; IS = inferoseptal; Tonset = onset time of shortening; Tpeak,first = time to first peak of shortening; Tpeak,max = time to maximum peak of shortening.

 


View larger version (57K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 3 Mean maps of the timing of shortening, illustrating the different timing patterns in nonischemic patients, ischemic patients, and healthy subjects. Note the similarity in the patterns between onset time and peak times for the nonischemic patients. These patterns are less similar and less distinct for the ischemic patients. The segments are defined in the bulls-eye top left. Tonset, Tpeak,first, and Tpeak,max all in ms from the ECG R-wave. AN = anterior; IN = inferior; other abbreviations as in Figure 2.

 


View larger version (20K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 4 Individual correlation coefficients between onset time and peak time, plotted versus the individual asynchrony in Tonset. The asynchrony in Tonset is defined as the intra-subject variance in Tonset and is a measure for the range of values that is available for the correlation. Each data point represents one subject. (Top row) Correlation coefficients from nonischemic patients (n = 18), using (A) Tpeak,first and (B) Tpeak,max. For some nonischemic patients, no association between Tpeak,max and Tonset exists, even when there is a large asynchrony in Tonset, indicating an important discrepancy between Tpeak,max and Tonset, which is not observed between Tpeak,first and Tonset. (Bottom row) Correlation coefficients from ischemic patients (n = 11) for (C) Tpeak,first and (D) Tpeak,max. A considerable number of ischemic patients show a poor correlation between peak time and onset time, regardless of whether Tpeak,first or Tpeak,max is used. Abbreviations as in Figure 2.

 


View larger version (42K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 5 Individual maps of the timing of shortening, illustrating the difference in performance between Tpeak,first and Tpeak,max. (Subject A) nonischemic patient for whom both Tpeak,first and the Tpeak,max correlated well with Tonset. (Subject B) nonischemic patient for whom only Tpeak,first correlated well with Tonset. *Missing values. Abbreviations as in Figures 2 and 3.

 





HOME SUBSCRIPTIONS CURRENT ISSUE PAST ISSUES CARDIOSOURCE SEARCH HELP FEEDBACK
Copyright © 2005 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation.