cardiology careers collections past issues search home
     

J Am Coll Cardiol, 2005; 45:1441-1448, doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2004.12.074
© 2005 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (95)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Heiss, C.
Right arrow Articles by Kalka, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Heiss, C.
Right arrow Articles by Kalka, C.
Related Collections
Right arrowRelated Article

Impaired Progenitor Cell Activity in Age-Related Endothelial Dysfunction

Christian Heiss, MD, Stefanie Keymel, MS, Ulrike Niesler, MS, Jutta Ziemann, BS, Malte Kelm, MD and Christoph Kalka, MD*

Department of Cardiology, Pneumology, and Vascular Medicine, Heinrich-Heine-University, Düsseldorf, Germany



View larger version (17K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 1 Endothelial dysfunction in old subjects. Whereas (A) flow-mediated dilation (FMD) was significantly impaired in old subjects (n = 20, solid columns), (B) dilation after 400 µg of sublingual glycerol-trinitrate (GTN) was not (n = 20, open columns). (C) A decreased FMD/GTN ratio in the elder group implies specific endothelial dysfunction. Columns are mean ± SE.

 


View larger version (18K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 2 Concentrations of endothelial progenitor cells in old and young subjects. Neither the concentration of (A) KDR/CD133+ or (B) KDR/CD34+ cells was significantly different between old (n = 20, open columns) and young subjects (n = 20, solid columns). Columns represent mean values, error bars are the standard error; p < 0.05.

 


View larger version (17K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 3 The endothelial progenitor cell (EPC) function in old and young individuals. (A) EPC survival, (B) proliferation, and (C) migration are reduced in old (n = 20, open columns) as compared with young study subjects (n = 20, solid columns). Columns represent mean values, error bars are the standard error.

 


View larger version (15K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 4 Correlations of endothelial function and endothelial progenitor cell (EPC) function. Flow-mediated dilation (FMD) correlated with (A) EPC proliferation (r = 0.49, p < 0.05) and (B) migration (r = 0.52, p < 0.01). Open circles = old subjects; solid circles = young subjects.

 




 
  cardiology careers collections past issues search home