Advertisement






Click here for more guidelines.
CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home
     

J Am Coll Cardiol, 2005; 45:1193-1200, doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2004.11.063
© 2005 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (40)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ellis, S. G.
Right arrow Articles by Stone, G. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ellis, S. G.
Right arrow Articles by Stone, G. W.

Relationship between angiographic late loss and target lesion revascularization after coronary stent implantation

Analysis from the TAXUS-IV trial

Stephen G. Ellis, MD*,*, Jeffrey J. Popma, MD{dagger}, John M. Lasala, MD, PhD{ddagger}, Joerg J. Koglin, MD§, David A. Cox, MD||, James Hermiller, MD, Charles O’Shaughnessy, MD#, James Tift Mann, MD**, Mark Turco, MD{dagger}{dagger}, Ronald Caputo, MD{ddagger}{ddagger}, Patrick Bergin, MD§§, Joel Greenberg, MD|||| and Gregg W. Stone, MD¶¶,##

* Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, The Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio
{dagger} Brigham & Women’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
{ddagger} Division of Cardiology, Washington University, School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri
§ Cardiovascular Clinical Affairs, Boston Scientific, Natick, Massachusetts
|| Mid Carolina Cardiology, Charlotte, North Carolina
St. Vincent’s Hospital, Indianapolis, Indiana
# Elyria Memorial Hospital, Elyria, Ohio
** WakeMed, Raleigh, North Carolina
{dagger}{dagger} Washington Adventist Hospital, Tacoma Park, Maryland
{ddagger}{ddagger} St. Joseph’s Hospital, Syracuse, New York
§§ Sacred Heart Medical Center, Eugene, Oregon
|||| Florida Hospital, Orlando, Florida
¶¶ Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York
## Cardiovascular Research Foundation, New York, New York.



View larger version (35K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 1 Histograms for late loss for the paclitaxel-eluting and control bare-metal EXPRESS stent groups for in-stent (A), analysis segment (B), and maximal regional (C) late loss definitions. Paclitaxel-eluting-treated patients had less, but more heterogeneously distributed, late loss.

 


View larger version (25K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 2 Patient count data for those with and without target lesion revascularization (TLR), dividing late loss into 0.2-mm increments: (A) in-stent, (B) analysis segment, (C) maximal regional late loss.

 


View larger version (14K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 3 Cumulative frequency distribution curves for (A) in-stent, (B) in-segment, (C) maximal regional late loss for the combined angiographic populations versus target lesion revascularization (TLR). Prob = probability.

 


View larger version (16K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 4 Cumulative frequency distribution cares for in-segment late loss versus target lesion revascularization (TLR) for reference vessel size <2.5, 2.5 to 3.0, and >3.0 mm. Prob = probability.

 




 
  CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home

Advertisement