Advertisement






Click here for more guidelines.
CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home
     

J Am Coll Cardiol, 2005; 45:941-946, doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2004.11.064
© 2005 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (81)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bavry, A. A.
Right arrow Articles by Bhatt, D. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bavry, A. A.
Right arrow Articles by Bhatt, D. L.

What is the risk of stent thrombosis associated with the use of paclitaxel-eluting stents for percutaneous coronary intervention?

A meta-analysis

Anthony A. Bavry, MD, MPH*, Dharam J. Kumbhani, MD, SM{dagger}, Thomas J. Helton, DO* and Deepak L. Bhatt, MD*,*

* Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio
{dagger} Department of Cardiac Surgery, Veterans Administration Boston Healthcare System, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts



View larger version (32K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 1 In trials with varying doses of paclitaxel, a = 1.3, b = 3.1, A = 0.2, B = 0.7, C = 1.4, and D = 2.7 µg paclitaxel/mm2 of stent. BMS = bare-metal stent; CI = confidence interval; DES = drug-eluting stent; MR = moderate-release; SR = slow-release.

 




 
  CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home

Advertisement