Advertisement






Click here for more guidelines.
CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home
     

J Am Coll Cardiol, 2005; 45:915-921, doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2004.11.049
© 2005 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (8)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Abd El Rahman, M. Y.
Right arrow Articles by Abdul-Khaliq, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Abd El Rahman, M. Y.
Right arrow Articles by Abdul-Khaliq, H.

Detection of left ventricular asynchrony in patients with right bundle branch block after repair of tetralogy of Fallot using tissue-Doppler imaging-derived strain

Mohamed Y. Abd El Rahman, MD*, Wei Hui, MD*, Moustafa Yigitbasi, MD*, Fatima Dsebissowa, MD*, Stephan Schubert, MD*, Roland Hetzer, MD, PhD{dagger}, Peter E. Lange, MD, PhD* and Hashim Abdul-Khaliq, MD, PhD*,*

* Department of Congenital Heart Disease, Deutsches Herzzentrum, Berlin, Germany
{dagger} Department of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, Deutsches Herzzentrum, Berlin, Germany



View larger version (13K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 1 Comparison of the left ventricular delay between patients after tetralogy of Fallot (TOF) repair and healthy control subjects. Compared with control subjects, patients after TOF repair have significant left ventricular delay. *TOF versus normal healthy subjects, p < 0.05.

 


View larger version (16K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 2 Comparison of the left ventricular delay between patients after tetralogy of Fallot (TOF) repair in New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class I and those in class II. Patients in NYHA functional class II have significantly more left ventricular delay when compared with patients in class I. *TOF versus normal healthy subjects, p < 0.05.

 


View larger version (19K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 3 Tetralogy of Fallot (TOF) patients with and without left ventricular asynchrony. According to the mean left ventricular delay among the normal subjects, a normal range (mean ± 2 SD) was plotted. Using this normal range, TOF patients were further divided into two groups: group 1, TOF patients without left ventricular asynchrony (n = 12, 48%) and group 2, TOF patients with left ventricular asynchrony (n = 13, 52%). Solid circles = patients after TOF repair; open triangles = healthy control subjects.

 


View larger version (16K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 4 Comparison of global left ventricular (LV) function assessed by the Tei index between patients after tetralogy of Fallot (TOF) repair with and without LV asynchrony. *Patients after TOF repair without left intraventricular asynchrony and those with left ventricular asynchrony, p < 0.05.

 


View larger version (18K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 5 Receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve of the QRS duration for prediction of left ventricular (LV) asynchrony in patients after tetralogy of Fallot (TOF) repair and right bundle branch block. AUC = area under the curve.

 




 
  CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home

Advertisement