cardiology careers collections past issues search home
     

J Am Coll Cardiol, 2005; 45:697-704, doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2004.11.043
© 2005 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (20)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Adabag, A. S.
Right arrow Articles by Maron, B. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Adabag, A. S.
Right arrow Articles by Maron, B. J.

Spectrum and prognostic significance of arrhythmias on ambulatory Holter electrocardiogram in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy

A. Selcuk Adabag, MD*,*, Susan A. Casey, RN{dagger}, Michael A. Kuskowski, PhD*, Andrey G. Zenovich, MSc{dagger} and Barry J. Maron, MD, FACC{dagger}

* Division of Cardiology, and Geriatric Research Education and Clinical Center, Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Minneapolis, Minnesota
{dagger} Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy Center, Minneapolis Heart Institute Foundation, Minneapolis, Minnesota



View larger version (18K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 1 Flow diagram showing the clinical outcome of 178 patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) who underwent 24-h ambulatory (Holter) electrocardiogram monitoring. HF = heart failure.

 


View larger version (13K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 2 Prevalence of ventricular and supraventricular arrhythmias on 24-h ambulatory (Holter) electrocardiogram recording in 178 patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. NSVT = nonsustained ventricular tachycardia; PVC = premature ventricular complex; SVT = supraventricular tachycardia.

 


View larger version (15K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 3 Relation between age at 24-h ambulatory (Holter) electrocardiogram (ECG) monitoring and the number of premature ventricular complexes (PVCs) in the 157 hypertrophic cardiomyopathy patients with PVCs.

 


View larger version (23K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 4 Relation of symptom severity (top panel) and left ventricular outflow obstruction (bottom panel) with the occurrence of arrhythmias on 24-h ambulatory (Holter) electrocardiogram monitoring in 178 hypertrophic cardiomyopathy patients. AF = atrial fibrillation; LVOTG = left ventricular outflow tract gradient; NSVT = nonsustained ventricular tachycardia; NYHA = New York Heart Association; PVC = premature ventricular complex; SVT = supraventricular tachycardia.

 


View larger version (35K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 5 Relation between maximum left ventricular (LV) wall thickness and occurrence of various tachyarrhythmias on 24-h ambulatory (Holter) electrocardiogram recording in 178 hypertrophic cardiomyopathy patients. Nonsustained ventricular tachycardia (NSVT) increased progressively and in direct relation to maximal LV thickness (p = 0.02 by the chi-square test for trend). Supraventricular tachycardia (SVT) was less common in patients with maximal LV thickness ≥30 mm vs. <30 mm (p = 0.001). PVCs = premature ventricular complexes.

 




 
  cardiology careers collections past issues search home