Advertisement






Click here for more guidelines.
CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home
     

J Am Coll Cardiol, 2005; 45:1987-1993, doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2005.02.073
© 2005 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Witte, D. R.
Right arrow Articles by Bots, M. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Witte, D. R.
Right arrow Articles by Bots, M. L.
Related Collections
Right arrowRelated Article

Is the Association Between Flow-Mediated Dilation and Cardiovascular Risk Limited to Low-Risk Populations?

Daniel R. Witte, MD, PhD*, Jan Westerink, MD{dagger}, Eelco J. de Koning, MD, PhD{dagger},{ddagger}, Yolanda van der Graaf, MD, PhD*, Diederick E. Grobbee, MD, PhD* and Michiel L. Bots, MD, PhD*,*

* Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
{dagger} Department of Internal Medicine, Section of Vascular Medicine, Diabetes and Endocrinology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
{ddagger} Department of Internal Medicine, Section of Nephrology, Leids University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands



View larger version (22K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 1 Plot of the mean flow-mediated dilation (FMD) of the brachial artery by mean Framingham risk estimate for each of the study populations. Line is the Lowess regression line. Points are weighted according to the inverse variance of FMD for each study [1/SE (FMD)2]. Tertiles of Framingham risk cutoff points were 2.8% and 9.5%.

 


View larger version (13K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 2 The association between Framingham risk and flow-mediated dilation (FMD) of the brachial artery within tertiles of Framingham risk, with 95% confidence intervals.

 




 
  CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home

Advertisement