Advertisement






Click here for more guidelines.
CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home
     

J Am Coll Cardiol, 2005; 45:1815-1822, doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2004.11.069
© 2005 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (81)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Abdel-Aty, H.
Right arrow Articles by Schulz-Menger, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Abdel-Aty, H.
Right arrow Articles by Schulz-Menger, J.
Related Collections
Right arrowRelated Article

Diagnostic Performance of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance in Patients With Suspected Acute Myocarditis

Comparison of Different Approaches

Hassan Abdel-Aty, MD*, Philipp Boyé, MD*, Anja Zagrosek, MD*, Ralf Wassmuth, MD*, Andreas Kumar, MD*, Daniel Messroghli, MD*, Petra Bock, MD*, Rainer Dietz, MD*, Matthias G. Friedrich, MD, FESC*,{dagger} and Jeanette Schulz-Menger, MD*,*

* Franz-Volhard-Klinik, Charité Campus Buch, Universität Medizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
{dagger} Stephenson CMR Centre, Departments of Cardiac Sciences and Radiology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada



View larger version (80K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 1 Cardiovascular magnetic resonance images from Patient #6. (Top) Pre- and postcontrast axial T1-weighted spin echo images of the same slice. Global relative enhancement was elevated (4.6). Regions of interest are drawn around the myocardium and within the skeletal muscle. (Middle) Short-axis T2-weighted images: no focal areas of high T2 signal, yet the higher global myocardial T2 signal in relation to the skeletal muscle is visibly appreciable (exact value = 2.5). (Bottom) Corresponding late enhancement images: no evidence of late gadolinium enhancement.

 


View larger version (67K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 2 Cardiovascular magnetic resonance findings in Patient #21. (Top) Pre- and postcontrast axial T1-weighted spin echo images of the same slice. Global relative enhancement was elevated (4.1). (Middle) T2-weighted images in three short-axis slices. Note the posterolateral focal high T2 signal (arrowheads) in the basal slice with apparent focal increase in myocardial thickness. (Bottom) Corresponding late enhancement images: no evidence of late gadolinium enhancement.

 


View larger version (15K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 3 Receiver operating characteristic curves for global relative enhancement (solid line) and global relative T2 signal (broken line).

 


View larger version (110K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 4 Representative images from 3 patients (#8, #12, and #14 from left to right, respectively). (Top) Late gadolinium enhancement (LGE). (Bottom) T2-weighted. Focal high T2 signal (thin arrows) corresponds to areas of LGE (arrowheads) in Patients #8 and #12 but not in Patient #14. Note the predominant epicardial distribution of high T2 signal in Patient #12. Small pericardial effusion is seen in Patient #8 (thick curved arrow).

 


View larger version (53K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 5 Diagnostic performance of T2, late gadolinium enhancement (LGE), and global relative enhancement (GRE) as compared to the "any-two" approach. Spotted bars = sensitivity; diagonal striped bars = specificity; solid bars = diagnostic accuracy.

 




 
  CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home

Advertisement