Embolic Protection Devices for Carotid Artery Stenting
Is There a Difference Between Filter and Distal Occlusive Devices?
Ralf Zahn, MD, FESC*,*,
Thomas Ischinger, MD, FESC
,
Bernd Mark, MD*,
Sabine Gass, MD
,
Uwe Zeymer, MD, FESC*,
Wolfgang Schmalz, MD
,
Klaus Haerten, MD||,
Karl Eugen Hauptmann, MD¶,
Enz-Rüdiger von Leitner, MD#,
Wolfgang Kasper, MD**,
Ulrich Tebbe, MD, FESC
,
Jochen Senges, MD, FACC, FESC* for the Arbeitsgemeinschaft Leitende Kardiologische Krankenhausärzte (ALKK)
* Herzzentrum, Kardiologie, Ludwigshafen
Städtisches Klinikum, Kardiologie, München-Bogenhausen
Städtisches Klinikum, Neurologie, Ludwigshafen
Stadtkrankenhaus, Kardiologie, Worms
|| Marienkrankenhaus, Kardiologie, Wesel
¶ Krankenhaus der Barmherzigen Brüder, Kardiologie, Trier
# Klinikum Siloah, Kardiologie, Hannover
** St. Josefs Hospital, Kardiologie, Wiesbaden

Klinikum Lippe-Detmold, Kardiologie, Detmold, Germany

View larger version (33K):
[in a new window]
|
Figure 1 Development in the use of different embolic protection devices (PD) over time. Hatched bars = filter embolic protection device; solid bars = distal occlusive embolic protection device; open bars = no distal protection.
|
|

View larger version (26K):
[in a new window]
|
Figure 2 Use of different filter devices.
|
|
Copyright © 2005 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation.