Advertisement






Click here for more guidelines.
CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home
     

J Am Coll Cardiol, 2004; 44:1664-1671, doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2004.02.065
© 2004 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Yip, G.
Right arrow Articles by Abraham, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Yip, G.
Right arrow Articles by Abraham, T.

Strain echocardiography tracks dobutamine-induced decrease in regional myocardial perfusion in nonocclusive coronary stenosis

Gabriel Yip, MRCP, Bijoy Khandheria, MD, FACC, Marek Belohlavek, MD, FACC, Cristina Pislaru, MD, James Seward, MD, FACC, Kent Bailey, PhD, A. Jamil Tajik, MD, FACC, Patricia Pellikka, MD, FACC and Theodore Abraham, MD, FACC*

Division of Cardiovascular Diseases, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MinnesotaUSA



View larger version (41K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 1 Schematic representation of the animal model and study flow (see text for details). LAD = left anterior descending artery; RMBF = regional myocardial blood flow.

 


View larger version (52K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 2 Invasive hemodynamic parameters of global systolic and diastolic function at peak dobutamine (Dob) were similar with and without stenosis (A). Regional myocardial blood flow (RMBF) at peak dobutamine was lower with compared to without stenosis (B, left panel). Peak change in systolic strain rate (sSR) and time to regional lengthening (TRL) at peak dobutamine was significantly blunted with compared to without stenosis (B, middle and right panels, respectively). *p < 0.01 between baseline and dobutamine + stenosis; {dagger}p < 0.01 between baseline and dobutamine; {ddagger}p < 0.01 between dobutamine and dobutamine + stenosis. SE = strain echocardiography.

 


View larger version (17K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 3 Correlation between peak systolic strain rate (sSR) and regional myocardial blood flow (RMBF).

 


View larger version (66K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 4 Representative color M-mode and strain rate images at baseline (A), dobutamine without stenosis (B), and dobutamine (DOB) with stenosis (C). Despite similar increases in heart rate (HR), regional myocardial blood flow (RMBF) is reduced, and the dobutamine-induced increase in sSR and a decrease in TRL (B) significantly blunted in the presence (C) versus absence (B) of coronary stenosis. Other abbreviations as in Figure 2.

 


View larger version (30K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 5 Change in sSR (A) and TRL (B) from baseline to peak dobutamine stress was significantly lower in ischemic versus normal segments (both p < 0.0001; dashed lines = mean, solid lines = 1 SD). Using a combination of the best cutoff values for change in sSR and TRL significantly increased the specificity compared with sSR and TRL alone (C). Open circles = control segment response; black circles = ischemic segment response. (D) Receiver operating characteristic curves demonstrated that the area under the curve was similar for sSR compared with TRL, and was higher for sSR + TRL compared with TRL alone (p = 0.01) and for sSR alone (p = 0.05). Abbreviations as in Figure 2.

 




 
  CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home

Advertisement