Advertisement






Click here for more guidelines.
CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home
     

J Am Coll Cardiol, 2004; 44:1557-1566, doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2004.05.084
© 2004 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pérez-Gómez, F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Pérez-Gómez, F.

Comparative effects of antiplatelet, anticoagulant, or combined therapy in patients with valvular and nonvalvular atrial fibrillation

A randomized multicenter study

Francisco Pérez-Gómez, PhD, FESC*,*, Eduardo Alegría, MD, PhD{dagger}, Jesus Berjón, MD, PhD{ddagger}, Jose A. Iriarte, MD, PhD§, Javier Zumalde, MD||, Antonio Salvador, MD, PhD, Luis Mataix, MD# NASPEAF Investigators

* Hospital Clínico San Carlos, Madrid, Spain
{dagger} Clínica Universitaria de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain
{ddagger} Hospital de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain
§ Hospital de Basurto, Bilbao, Spain
|| Hospital Galdakao, Bilbao, Spain
Hospital Dr. Peset, Valencia, Spain
# Centro Especialidades Avenida de Portugal, Madrid, Spain



View larger version (23K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 1 Flow diagram of the NASPEAF. Lost to follow-up corresponds to those patients about whom no data about efficacy and safety is available. INR = international normalized ratio; ITT = intention to treat; IQR = interquartile range.

 


View larger version (21K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 2 Primary outcome Kaplan-Meier survival curves. (A) Intermediate-risk group (nonvalvular atrial fibrillation without embolism at baseline). (B) High-risk group (mitral stenosis with/without embolism and nonvalvular atrial fibrillation with embolism at baseline). N = number at risk; SE = standard error.

 


View larger version (23K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 3 Relative effect on vascularevents of combined versus anticoagulant therapy. Log hazard ratio (HR) (95% confidence interval [CI]) = logarithm hazard ratio whose 95% CI (error bars) excludes the vertical line are statistically significant at the 5% level (or significant with p < 0.05). AMI = acute myocardial infarction.

 


View larger version (27K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 4 Kaplan-Meier survival curves of the composite embolism-stroke-transient ischemic attack (TIA) in different groups of patients. (A) Survival curves inthe combined therapy and anticoagulant arms of the intermediate- and high-risk groups. (B) Survival curves in groups of patients receiving anticoagulant therapy for INR (2 to 3). ACO = anticoagulant; Emb/embol = embolism; TIA = transient ischemic attack; other abbreviations as in Figure 2.

 




 
  CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home

Advertisement