JACC
HOME SUBSCRIPTIONS CURRENT ISSUE PAST ISSUES CARDIOSOURCE SEARCH HELP FEEDBACK
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Am Coll Cardiol, 2004; 44:1194-1199, doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2004.06.049
© 2004 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Saw, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Saw, J.

Lack of clopidogrel pretreatment effect on the relative efficacy of bivalirudin with provisional glycoprotein IIb/IIIa blockade compared to heparin with routine glycoprotein IIb/IIIa blockade

A REPLACE-2 substudy

Jacqueline Saw, MD*, A. Michael Lincoff, MD*,*, Walter DeSmet, MD{dagger}, Amadeo Betriu, MD{ddagger}, Wolfgang Rutsch, MD§, Robert G. Wilcox, MD||, Neil S. Kleiman, MD, Kathy Wolski, MPH*, Eric J. Topol, MD* REPLACE-2 Investigators*

* Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, the Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
{dagger} University Hospital Gasthuisberg, Leuven, Belgium
{ddagger} Hospital Clinic, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
§ Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
|| University Hospital Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom
Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA



View larger version (24K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 1 Comparison of bivalirudin with provisional glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa blockade versus heparin with routine GP IIb/IIIa blockade with respect to the primary composite end point of death, myocardial infarction, urgent revascularization, and in-hospital major bleeding by 30 days in the Randomized Evaluation in Percutaneous coronary intervention Linking Angiomax to reduced Clinical Events (REPLACE-2) trial.

 


View larger version (15K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 2 Comparison of clopidogrel pretreatment versus no pretreatment with respect to 30-day primary (death, myocardial infarction, urgent revascularization, and in-hospital major bleeding) and secondary (death, myocardial infarction, and urgent revascularization) end points in patients randomized to bivalirudin plus provisional glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa blockade or heparin plus routine GP IIb/IIIa blockade.

 


View larger version (24K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 3 Comparison of bivalirudin with provisional glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa blockade versus heparin with routine GP IIb/IIIa blockade with respect to the secondary composite end point of death, myocardial infarction, and urgent revascularization at 30 days in the Randomized Evaluation in Percutaneous coronary intervention Linking Angiomax to reduced Clinical Events (REPLACE-2) trial.

 





HOME SUBSCRIPTIONS CURRENT ISSUE PAST ISSUES CARDIOSOURCE SEARCH HELP FEEDBACK
Copyright © 2004 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation.