Advertisement

Click here for more guidelines.

 
 




CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home
     

J Am Coll Cardiol, 2004; 44:799-803, doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2004.03.081
© 2004 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sadanandan, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sadanandan, S.

A risk score to estimate the likelihood of coronary artery bypass surgery during the index hospitalization among patients with unstable angina and non–ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction

Saihari Sadanandan, MD*,*, Christopher P. Cannon, MD{dagger}, C. Michael Gibson, MS, MD{dagger}, Sabina A. Murphy, MPH{dagger}, Peter M. DiBattiste, MD{ddagger}, Eugene Braunwald, MD{dagger} the TIMI Study Group

* Oklahoma University Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, USA
{dagger} Harvard Medical School and the Department of Medicine, Brigham & Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
{ddagger} Merck & Co., West Point, Pennsylvania, USA



View larger version (19K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 1 Distribution of the coronary artery bypass surgery risk score in the overall TACTICS–TIMI-18 patient population. Risk score: <3.0, 42%; 3 to 5, 55%; >5.0, 3%.

 


View larger version (13K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 2 Rates of in-hospital coronary artery bypass surgery (CABG) in patients with prior CABG and low, intermediate, and high CABG risk scores in the overall TACTICS–TIMI-18 population (n = 1,828). Association of the risk score with in-hospital CABG, p value for trend <0.0001; c-statistic 0.72.

 


View larger version (24K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 3 Association of the risk score with in-hospital coronary artery bypass surgery (CABG) in the invasive and conservative arms of TACTICS–TIMI-18 trial. Solid bars = invasive; hatched bars = conservative. Invasive arm (n = 921) p value for trend <0.0001, c-statistic 0.71; conservative arm (n = 907) p value for trend <0.0001, c-statistic 0.73.

 


View larger version (14K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 4 Validation of the coronary artery bypass surgery (CABG) risk score in Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction (TIMI)-11b patient population with unstable angina and non–ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. Association of the risk score with in-hospital CABG in TIMI-11b (n = 3,722), p value for trend <0.0001; c-statistic 0.61.

 


View larger version (13K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 5 Validation of the coronary artery bypass surgery (CABG) risk score in Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction (TIMI)-III registry patient population with unstable angina and non–ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. Association of the risk score with in-hospital CABG in TIMI-III registry (n = 1,139), p value for trend <0.0001; c-statistic 0.66.

 




 
  CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home

Advertisement