JACC
HOME SUBSCRIPTIONS CURRENT ISSUE PAST ISSUES CARDIOSOURCE SEARCH HELP FEEDBACK
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Am Coll Cardiol, 2004; 44:766-774, doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2004.05.041
© 2004 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Alderman, E. L.
Right arrow Articles by Stadius, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Alderman, E. L.
Right arrow Articles by Stadius, M.

Native coronary disease progression exceeds failed revascularization as cause of angina after five years in the bypass angioplasty revascularization investigation (BARI)

Edwin L. Alderman, MD, FACC,*,*, Kevin E. Kip, PhD,{dagger}, Patrick L. Whitlow, MD, FACC,{ddagger}, Thomas Bashore, MD, FACC,§, Donald Fortin, MD,§, Martial G. Bourassa, MD, FACC,||, Jacques Lesperance, MD,||, Leonard Schwartz, MD, FACC, and Michael Stadius, MD, FACC#

* Cardiovascular Division, Stanford University, Stanford, California
{dagger} Graduate School of Public Health, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
{ddagger} Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
§ Cardiology Division, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina
|| Montreal Heart Institute, Montreal, Canada
Toronto General Hospital, Toronto, Canada
# University of Washington, Seattle, Washington



View larger version (64K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 1 The coronary artery map used by Bypass Angioplasty Revascularization Investigations (BARI and BARI2D) is the basis for relative artery sizing, stenosis placement, and estimation of myocardial jeopardy. The map is a modification of the Coronary Artery Surgery Study (CASS) diagram with inclusion of additional branch segments.

 


View larger version (21K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 2 (A) The distribution of myocardial jeopardy scores at baseline, one-year, and five-year angiography among the subset of 183 patients with all three assessments. The center block on each vertical line depicts the mean myocardial jeopardy; the horizontal hash marks at each end of the vertical line represent myocardial jeopardy scores at ± 1 SD from the mean. The "n's" for the percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) group reflect not having undergone prior coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG) at each follow-up assessment. (B) Histogram of the percentage of patients with angina at baseline, one-year, and five-year angiography by assigned mode of initial revascularization (CABG or PCI).

 


View larger version (17K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 3 Percentage of patients with increased jeopardized myocardium at five years, including cause of increased jeopardy and assigned mode of initial revascularization. Some patients have multiple causes of increased myocardial jeopardy, and thus are included in multiple categories. Open bars = percutaneous coronary intervention patients (202); solid bars = coronary artery bypass graft surgery patients (200). *Defined as increased jeopardy that occurs after initial revascularization and is not mitigated by subsequent revascularization procedures.

 


View larger version (21K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 4 Among patients with new or progressive disease evident at five years, histogram shows the percentage of all patients who experienced increased myocardial jeopardy attributable to vessels treated and/or untreated at the initial revascularization procedure. Open bars = percutaneous coronary intervention patients (76); solid bars = coronary artery bypass graft surgery patients (82).

 





HOME SUBSCRIPTIONS CURRENT ISSUE PAST ISSUES CARDIOSOURCE SEARCH HELP FEEDBACK
Copyright © 2004 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation.