cardiology careers collections past issues search home
     

J Am Coll Cardiol, 2004; 44:409-414, doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2004.04.045
© 2004 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Verma, A.
Right arrow Articles by Natale, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Verma, A.
Right arrow Articles by Natale, A.

Importance of ablating all potential right atrial flutter circuits in postcardiac surgery patients

Atul Verma, MD*, Nassir F. Marrouche, MD*,*, Niranjan Seshadri, MD*, Robert A. Schweikert, MD*, Mandeep Bhargava, MD*, J. David Burkhardt, MD*, Fethi Kilicaslan, MD*, Jennifer Cummings, MD*, Walid Saliba, MD* and Andrea Natale, MD*

* Department of Cardiology, Section of Cardiac Pacing and Electrophysiology, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio, USA



View larger version (23K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 1 Surface electrocardiograms (I, aVF, V1, V6) of both cavotricuspid isthmus (CTI)-dependent and scar-related atrial flutters in a single patient. In this patient, the presenting flutter was CTI-dependent moving in a classic clockwise direction with a cycle length of 245 ms (A). Although this flutter was successfully ablated with an isthmus ablation line, a second flutter was induced after ablation (B). Although the cycle length of this flutter is similar, the morphology and axis of the P waves is clearly different. This flutter was mapped and found to be coming from a re-entry circuit involving the incisional scar. Creating an ablation line from the incisional scar to the tricuspid annulus terminated this second flutter.

 


View larger version (35K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 2 Three-dimensional electroanatomic activation maps of both scar-related and cavotricuspid isthmus (CTI)-dependent flutters in the same patient. In this patient, electroanatomic mapping using the CARTO system demonstrated that the clinical flutter involved a re-entry circuit moving circumferentially around the incisional scar (A). The arrow in A indicates the direction of movement of activation from earliest to latest for this scar-related flutter. This flutter was successfully ablated by creating an ablation line from the scar to the tricuspid annulus (B, line 1). However, a second, CTI-dependent flutter was induced moving in a clockwise direction as indicated by the arrow in B. This flutter required a second isthmus ablation line to be created from the tricuspid annulus to the inferior vena cava (IVC) (B, line 2). TV = tricuspid valve.

 




 
  cardiology careers collections past issues search home