HOME SUBSCRIPTIONS CURRENT ISSUE PAST ISSUES CARDIOSOURCE SEARCH HELP FEEDBACK		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Abstract Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Gao, G. Articles by Starr, A. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Gao, G. Articles by Starr, A.

Durability of pericardial versus porcine aortic valves

^* Providence Health System, Portland, Oregon, USA

View larger version (18K): [in a new window]   Figure 1 Age distribution of patients undergoing aortic valve replacement with porcine and pericardial valve (vertical axis represents percentage).

View larger version (15K): [in a new window]   Figure 2 Probability of survival for porcine and pericardial aortic valve replacement patients.

View larger version (16K): [in a new window]   Figure 3 Freedom from thromboembolic events for porcine and pericardial aortic valve replacement patients.

View larger version (16K): [in a new window]   Figure 4 Freedom from explant for porcine and pericardial aortic valve replacement patients.

View larger version (15K): [in a new window]   Figure 5 Freedom from structural valve deterioration (SVD) for porcine and pericardial aortic valve replacement patients.

View larger version (20K): [in a new window]   Figure 6 Freedom from structural valve deterioration (SVD) for porcine aortic valve replacement patients in different age groups.