cardiology careers collections past issues search home
     

J Am Coll Cardiol, 2004; 44:300-304, doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2004.04.036
© 2004 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sato, H.
Right arrow Articles by Yoshikawa, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sato, H.
Right arrow Articles by Yoshikawa, J.

The decrease of plaque volume during percutaneous coronary intervention has a negative impact on coronary flow in acute myocardial infarction

A major role of percutaneous coronary intervention-induced embolization

Hiroshi Sato, MD*,*, Hidetaka Iida, MD*, Atsushi Tanaka, MD{dagger}, Hidemasa Tanaka, MD*, Shinichi Shimodouzono, MD*, Eiji Uchida, MD*, Takahiko Kawarabayashi, MD{dagger} and Junichi Yoshikawa, MD{ddagger}

* Tsukazaki Memorial Hospital, Himeji, Japan
{dagger} Baba Memorial Hospital, Sakai, Japan
{ddagger} Department of Internal Medicine and Cardiology, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka City University, Osaka, Japan



View larger version (15K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 1 The difference in {Delta}PV between patients with inadequate reflow and reflow. The {Delta}PV was significantly larger in patients with inadequate reflow than in those with reflow (49.4 ± 18.9 vs. 31.7 ± 15.5 mm3, p = 0.0010). PV = plaque volume.

 


View larger version (18K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 2 The relationship between {Delta}PV during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and corrected TIMI frame count (CTFC) after PCI. In 57 patients with TIMI flow grade 2 or 3, {Delta}PV significantly correlated with CTFC after PCI (r = 0.415, p = 0.0012). PV = plaque volume.

 


View larger version (18K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 3 The changes of plaque volume obtained in the stented segments and distal and proximal reference segments.

 




 
  cardiology careers collections past issues search home