Advertisement






Click here for more guidelines.
CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home
     

J Am Coll Cardiol, 2004; 44:2390-2397, doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2004.09.044
© 2004 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Krenz, M.
Right arrow Articles by Robbins, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Krenz, M.
Right arrow Articles by Robbins, J.

Impact of beta-myosin heavy chain expression on cardiac function during stress

Maike Krenz, MD and Jeffrey Robbins, PhD*

Division of Molecular Cardiovascular Biology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio



View larger version (36K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 1 Echocardiographic assessment of left ventricular (LV) function after coronary ligation. Solid bars = nontransgenic (NTG); open bars = transgenic (TG). *p < 0.05 TG versus NTG. {dagger}p < 0.05 infarct group versus respective sham group (n = 11 in NTG infarct group; n = 10 in TG infarct group; n = 10 in NTG sham group; n = 8 in TG sham group).

 


View larger version (30K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 2 (A) Systolic blood pressure after osmotic pump implantation (n = 9 to 11). (B) Ratio of left ventricular weight to body weight two weeks after pump implantation. Solid bars = nontransgenic (NTG); open bars = transgenic (TG). *p < 0.05 TG versus NTG. {dagger}p < 0.05 versus respective vehicle group. {ddagger}p < 0.05 24 h versus 2 weeks (n = 8 to 12). (C) Hematoxylin-eosin–stained 5-µm sections of lung tissue. Note perivascular edema and engorged alveolar capillaries filled with erythrocytes in the TG lung (arrows).

 


View larger version (15K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 3 (A) Exercise capacity on the treadmill of transgenic (TG) (open squares) and nontransgenic (NTG) (solid circles) mice at the end of the four-week swim training. (B) Ratio of left ventricular (LV) weight to body weight after four weeks in exercised and non-exercised groups. Solid bars = NTG; open bars = TG. *p < 0.05 versus respective non-exercised group (n = 4 to 6 in each group).

 


View larger version (28K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 4 Left ventricular (LV) function and chamber dimensions before and after swim training, as assessed by echocardiography. Solid bars = nontransgenic (NTG); open bars = transgenic (TG). *p < 0.05 before versus after swim training (n = 5 or 6 in each group).

 


View larger version (19K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 5 Hemodynamic parameters under acute dobutamine challenge in increasing doses in the intact, closed-chest animal. (A) Left ventricular systolic peak pressure (LVP). (B) Maxima of the first derivative of left ventricular pressure (dP/dtmax). Solid squares = nontransgenic (NTG); open squares = transgenic (TG). *p < 0.05 TG versus NTG (n = 4 or 5 per group).

 




 
  CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home

Advertisement