Advertisement






Click here for more guidelines.
CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home
     

J Am Coll Cardiol, 2004; 44:2157-2165, doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2004.08.065
© 2004 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bordachar, P.
Right arrow Articles by Clementy, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bordachar, P.
Right arrow Articles by Clementy, J.

Echocardiographic parameters of ventricular dyssynchrony validation in patients with heart failure using sequential biventricular pacing

Pierre Bordachar, MD, Stephane Lafitte, MD, PhD, Sylvain Reuter, MD, Prashanthan Sanders, MBBS, PhD, Pierre Jaïs, MD, Michel Haïssaguerre, MD, Raymond Roudaut, MD, Stephane Garrigue, MD, PhD* and Jacques Clementy, MD

Hôpital Cardiologique du Haut Leveque, Pessac, France



View larger version (92K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 1 Measurements of the electro-mechanical delaypeak of the basal portion of the septal and lateral walls before the implantation, in simultaneous biventricular pacing (BVP), and in optimized sequential BVP (pre-activation of the left ventricular [LV] lead of 20 ms). Important delay (110 ms) between the two segments in spontaneous rhythm, reduction of this delay (50 ms) in simultaneous BVP, and further improvement (0 ms) in optimized sequential BVP.

 


View larger version (29K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 2 Correlation between the changes in the parameters of ventricular dyssynchrony and those of cardiac output (CO). A high correlation is shown between the changes in the index of dyssynchrony, the intraventricular delaypeak, and the changes in CO; lower correlation for the extent of myocardium displaying delayed longitudinal contraction (DLC); no correlation for the interventricular delay (intra-LV delay). LV = left ventricular.

 


View larger version (32K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 3 Correlation between the changes in the parameters of ventricular dyssynchrony and those of mitral regurgitation (MR). A high correlation is shown between the changes in the index of dyssynchrony, the intra-LV delaypeak, and the changes in MR; lower correlation for the extent of myocardium displaying DLC; no correlation for the interventricular delay. Abbreviations as in Figure 2.

 


View larger version (94K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 4 Reduction of mitral regurgitation with optimized sequential biventricular pacing (BVP). Pre-implant effective regurgitant orifice area (EROA): 31 mm2; simultaneous BVP EROA: 22 mm2; sequential BVP with right ventricular (RV) pre-activation of 40 ms EROA: 21 mm2; optimized sequential BVP with left ventricular (LV) pre-activation of 40 ms EROA: 10 mm2.

 




 
  CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home

Advertisement