Advertisement






Click here for more guidelines.
CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home
     

J Am Coll Cardiol, 2004; 44:2073-2079, doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2004.09.043
© 2004 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Schömig, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Schömig, A.

A randomized trial of coronary stenting versus balloon angioplasty as a rescue intervention after failed thrombolysis in patients with acute myocardial infarction

Albert Schömig, MD*,*,{dagger}, Gjin Ndrepepa, MD*, Julinda Mehilli, MD*, Josef Dirschinger, MD{dagger}, Stefan G. Nekolla, PhD{ddagger}, Claus Schmitt, MD*, Stefan Martinoff, MD*, Melchior Seyfarth, MD*, Markus Schwaiger, MD{ddagger}, Adnan Kastrati, MD* STOPAMI-4 Study Investigators§

* Deutsches Herzzentrum
{dagger} 1. Medizinische Klinik rechts der Isar
{ddagger} Klinik und Poliklinik für Nuklearmedizin rechts der Isar, Technische Universität, Munich, Germany
§ The centers and investigators participating in the STOPAMI-4 study are listed in the Appendix.



View larger version (17K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 1 Primary end point of the trial, salvage index (median and interquartile range), in the stent group and in the angioplasty group.

 




 
  CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home

Advertisement