Advertisement






Click here for more guidelines.
CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home
     

J Am Coll Cardiol, 2004; 44:1966-1969, doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2004.08.049
© 2004 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Schmidt, A.
Right arrow Articles by Scheinert, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Schmidt, A.
Right arrow Articles by Scheinert, D.

Effect of two different neuroprotection systems on microembolization during carotid artery stenting

Andrej Schmidt, MD*, Klaus-Werner Diederich, MD, Susanne Scheinert, MD, Sven Bräunlich, MD, Tatjana Olenburger, Giancarlo Biamino, MD, Gerhard Schuler, MD and Dierk Scheinert, MD

Divisionof Clinical and Interventional Angiology, Department of Cardiology, University of Leipzig–Heart Center, Leipzig, Germany



View larger version (31K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 1 Tipof the MO.MA system. Inflated common and external carotid artery balloons for endovascular clamping and exit port of the guiding catheter. ACC = arteria carotis communis; ACE = arteria carotis externa.

 


View larger version (136K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 2 (A) MO.MA system placed into the external carotid artery (ECA) and common carotid artery (CCA); (B) 0.014-inch guidewire for passage of the stenosis after clamping of the ECA and CCA. Abbreviations as in Figure 1.

 




 
  CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home

Advertisement