Advertisement






Click here for more guidelines.
CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home
     

J Am Coll Cardiol, 2004; 44:14-19, doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2004.03.042
© 2004 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Valgimigli, M.
Right arrow Articles by Ferrari, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Valgimigli, M.
Right arrow Articles by Ferrari, R.

The additive value of tirofiban administered with the high-dose bolus in the prevention of ischemic complications during high-risk coronary angioplasty

The advance trial

Marco Valgimigli, MD*{dagger},*, Gianfranco Percoco, MD*, Dario Barbieri, MD*, Fabrizio Ferrari, MD*, Gabriele Guardigli, MD*, Giovanni Parrinello, PhD{ddagger}, Olga Soukhomovskaia, MD* and Roberto Ferrari, MD, PhD*{dagger}

* Department of Cardiology, University of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy
{dagger} Cardiovascular Research Centre, Salvatore Maugeri Foundation, IRCCS Gussago (BS), Gussago, Italy
{ddagger} Medical Statistics Unit, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy



View larger version (13K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 1 Kaplan-Meier survival analysis: plot of proportion of cumulative survival free from primary end point events in patients treated with high-dose bolus (HDB) tirofiban (solid line) and placebo (dotted line). The difference in the incidence of events emerged soon after the procedure. At month 6, the hazard ratio was 0.51 (95% confidence interval 0.29 to 0.88, p = 0.01 by the log-rank test).

 


View larger version (10K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 2 Subgroup analysis. Hazard risk of primary end point according to the presence or absence of acute coronary syndrome as an indication to percutaneous coronary intervention or a history of diabetes. The horizontal lines indicate the 95% confidence interval.

 




 
  CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home

Advertisement