Advertisement






Click here for more guidelines.
CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home
     

J Am Coll Cardiol, 2004; 43:1248-1256, doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2003.09.062
© 2004 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Nelson, C.
Right arrow Articles by Marwick, T. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Nelson, C.
Right arrow Articles by Marwick, T. H.

Impact of scar thickness on the assessment of viability using dobutamine echocardiography and thallium single-photon emission computed tomography

A comparison with contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging

Charles Nelson, MBBS, FRACP*, Jane McCrohon, MBBS, PhD, FRACP*, Frederick Khafagi, MBBS, FRACP*, Stephen Rose, PhD*, Rodel Leano, BS* and Thomas H. Marwick, MBBS, PhD, FACC*,*

* University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia



View larger version (34K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 1 Relationship between transmural extent of scar (TES) and resting systolic function by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) (left) and two-dimensional echocardiogram (2DE) (right). Increasing TES is associated with a significant reduction in the proportion of segments with residual wall thickening (p < 0.001 for both MRI and 2DE). Note that in the 25% to 75% TES range, over 50% of segments still have some contractile function at rest, whereas almost all segments with >75% scar have abnormal resting function.

 


View larger version (26K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 2 Relationship between transmual extent of scar (TES) and thallium (Tl) activity at late redistribution (left) and increase in wall motion score (WMS) with low-dose dobutamine (right). Thallium activity at redistribution and the degree of low-dose augmentation both decrease significantly with increasing TES (p < 0.001), with no significant difference between dobutamine echocardiography and Tl-single-photon emission computed tomography. The 60% Tl activity cut-off for viability is shown.

 


View larger version (122K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 3 Correlation between dobutamine echocardiography and thallium single-photon emission computed tomography (Tl-SPECT) in a patient demonstrating nontransmural infarction in the apical septum (long arrow) and transmural infarction of the apical lateral segment (short arrow) by contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (ceMRI). The resting echocardiogram shows akinesia of both segments, and Tl-SPECT shows a severe perfusion defect.

 


View larger version (53K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 4 Pairwise agreement in the diagnosis of segments as viable (V) and nonviable (NV) with dobutamine echocardiography (DbE), contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (ceMRI), and thallium single-photon emission computed tomography (Tl-SPECT). The top row relates to the correspondence in all 372 segments, whereas the middle and bottom rows reflect the agreement in patients studied ≤3 months and >3 months after infarction. Each modality demonstrated only moderate agreement with the other two, irrespective of the time since infarction.

 


View larger version (54K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 5 Proportion of segments in which the results of thallium single-photon emission computed tomography (Tl-SPECT) and dobutamine echocardiography (DbE) were concordant (viable by both tests or nonviable by both tests) in each category of transmural extent of scar (TES). The overall concordance between Tl-SPECT and DbE is similar in each category of TES, increasing with TES >75%. Most segments that are viable by DbE are viable by Tl-SPECT when there is no scar (i.e., TES 0%), with more discrepancies as TES increases (p = 0.03). Segments that are nonviable by DbE show increasing concordance with increasing TES (p < 0.0001).

 




 
  CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home

Advertisement