Advertisement






Click here for more guidelines.
CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home
     

J Am Coll Cardiol, 2004; 43:1228-1235, doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2003.10.055
© 2004 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tang, W.
Right arrow Articles by Snyder, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Tang, W.
Right arrow Articles by Snyder, D.

The effects of biphasic waveform design on post-resuscitation myocardial function

Wanchun Tang, MD*{dagger},*, Max Harry Weil, MD, PhD*{dagger}, Shijie Sun, MD*{dagger}, Dawn Jorgenson, PhD{ddagger}, Carl Morgan, MSEE{ddagger}, Kada Klouche, MD* and David Snyder, MSEE{ddagger}

* Institute of Critical Care Medicine, Palm Springs, California, USA
{dagger} Keck School of Medicine of the University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA
{ddagger} Philips Medical Systems, Seattle, Washington, USA



View larger version (30K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 1 Biphasic waveforms used for the present study. Low-energy biphasic truncated exponential (BTEL) uses a 100-µF defibrillation capacitor, whereas high-energy biphasic truncated exponential (BTEH) uses 200-µF.

 


View larger version (18K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 2 Energy versus electrical current relationships for the therapies used in the study (circles and error bars indicate median and interquartile range): (A) peak current versus energy; (B) average current versus energy. BTEH = high-energy biphasic truncated exponential; BTEL = low-energy biphasic truncated exponential.

 


View larger version (30K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 3 Resuscitation characteristics (median and interquartile range) versus therapy as a percentage of the overall median for each characteristic. Overall median values: shocks = 3.5, total energy = 770 J, cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) = 158 s. *BTEH 200 J data exclude three of five animals that failed resuscitation and are therefore biased low. BTEH = high-energy biphasic truncated exponential; BTEL = low-energy biphasic truncated exponential.

 


View larger version (61K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 4 Hemodynamic outcome variables versus therapy at 30 and 240 min post resuscitation shown as median and interquartile range: (A) left ventricular ejection fraction (EF); (B) stroke volume (SV); (C) fractional area change (FAC); (D) mean aortic pressure (MAP); and (E) cardiac output (CO). *BTEH 200 J data exclude three of five animals that failed resuscitation and are therefore biased high. BTEH = high-energy biphasic truncated exponential; BTEL = low-energy biphasic truncated exponential.

 


View larger version (38K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 5 Effect of energy, peak current, and average current on outcome variables expressed as the normalized multiple regression coefficients (beta). CO = cardiac output; CPR = duration of cardiopulmonary resuscitation; E = energy; FAC = fractional area change; LVEF = left ventricular ejection fraction; MAP = mean aortic pressure; SV = stroke volume.

 




 
  CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home

Advertisement