Advertisement






Click here for more guidelines.
CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home
     

J Am Coll Cardiol, 2004; 43:929-935, doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2003.11.028
© 2004 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rockson, S. G.
Right arrow Articles by Albers, G. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Rockson, S. G.
Right arrow Articles by Albers, G. W.

Comparing the guidelines: anticoagulation therapy to optimize stroke prevention in patients with atrial fibrillation

Stanley G. Rockson, MD, FACC*,* and Gregory W. Albers, MD*

* Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA



View larger version (19K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 1 Warfarin use reduces the annual stroke rate compared with controls in patients with a variety of risk factors. CAD = coronary artery disease; CHF = congestive heart failure; HTN = hypertension; MI = myocardial infarction; PVD = pulmonary vascular disease; TIA = transient ischemic attack (3). Solid bars = control; open bars = warfarin.

 


View larger version (12K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 2 Relationship between the CHADS2 score and the risk of stroke (14).

 




 
  CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home

Advertisement