Advertisement






Click here for more guidelines.
CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home
     

J Am Coll Cardiol, 2004; 43:1110-1115, doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2004.01.024
© 2004 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Schampaert, E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Schampaert, E.

The Canadian study of the sirolimus-eluting stent in the treatment of patients with long de novo lesions in small native coronary arteries (C-SIRIUS)

Erick Schampaert, MD*,*, Eric A. Cohen, MD{dagger}, Michael Schlüter, PhD{ddagger}, François Reeves, MD§, Mouhieddin Traboulsi, MD||, Lawrence M. Title, MD, Richard E. Kuntz, MD, MSc, FACC#, Jeffrey J. Popma, MD, FACC# the C-SIRIUS Investigators

* Hôpital du Sacré-Coeur de Montréal, Montreal, Canada
{dagger} Sunnybrook and Women's College Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Canada
{ddagger} Center for Cardiology and Vascular Intervention, Hamburg, Germany
§ Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Pavillon Notre-Dame, Montreal, Canada
|| Calgary Heart Centre, Calgary, Canada
Queen Elizabeth II Health Science Centre, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
# Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA



View larger version (12K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 1 Late luminal loss by quantitative coronary angiography. Proximal edge: the 5-mm proximal to the stent. Distal edge: the 5-mm distal to the stent. Late loss was defined as the difference between the in-stent minimal lumen diameter at follow-up and the post-procedure in-stent minimal lumen diameter.

 


View larger version (13K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 2 Survival free from major adverse cardiac events (MACE). Absolute risk reduction: 14.3%, p = 0.029.

 




 
  CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home

Advertisement