Advertisement






Click here for more guidelines.
CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home
     

J Am Coll Cardiol, 2004; 43:842-847, doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2003.09.053
© 2004 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Achenbach, S.
Right arrow Articles by Daniel, W. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Achenbach, S.
Right arrow Articles by Daniel, W. G.

assessment of coronary remodeling in stenotic and nonstenotic coronary atherosclerotic lesions by multidetector spiral computed tomography

Stephan Achenbach, MD, FESC*{dagger}{ddagger},*, Dieter Ropers, MD{ddagger}, Udo Hoffmann, MD*, Briain MacNeill, MD{dagger}, Ulrich Baum, MD§, Karsten Pohle, MD{ddagger}, Tom J. Brady, MD*, Eugene Pomerantsev, MD, PhD{dagger}, Josef Ludwig, MD{ddagger}, Frank A. Flachskampf, MD, FACC, FESC{ddagger}, Stephan Wicky, MD*, Ik-kyung Jang, MD, PhD, FACC{dagger} and Werner G. Daniel, MD, FACC, FESC{ddagger}

* Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
{dagger} Division of Cardiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
{ddagger} Department of Internal Medicine II (Cardiology), University of Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany
§ Institute of Diagnostic Radiology, University of Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany



View larger version (165K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 1 Visualization of coronary plaque and assessment of remodeling by multidetector spiral computed tomography (MDCT). (A–D) Patient with a not significantly stenotic lesion in the proximal left anterior descending coronary artery. (A) X-ray coronary angiogram (arrow = site of the lesion); (B) axial MDCT image (1-mm slice thickness) at the level of the lesion (arrow); (C) MDCT reconstruction orthogonal to the vessel at the site of maximum luminal obstruction showing circumferential plaque (cross-sectional vessel area 41 mm2); (D) MDCT reconstruction orthogonal to the vessel in the reference segment (cross-sectional vessel area 35 mm2). Remodeling Index 1.2. (E–H) Patient with a high-grade stenosis of the left anterior descending coronary artery. (E) X-ray coronary angiogram (arrow = left anterior descending coronary artery stenosis); (F) axial MDCT image (1.0 mm slice thickness) at the level of the partly calcified lesion (arrow); (G) MDCT reconstruction orthogonal to the vessel at the site of maximum luminal obstruction (cross-sectional vessel area 22 mm2); (H) MDCT reconstruction orthogonal to the vessel in the reference segment (cross-sectional vessel area 22 mm2). Remodeling Index 1.

 


View larger version (115K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 2 (A) Multidetector spiral computed tomography (MDCT) cross-sections of the reference segment (left) and lesion (right) in a patient with a nonsignificant stenosis of the left anterior descending coronary artery. Eccentric plaque can be appreciated in the lesion (arrow). (B) Measurement of cross-sectional vessel areas in MDCT. Remodeling Index 1.1. (C) Measurement of cross-sectional vessel areas in IVUS (image orientation does not correspond to MDCT). Remodeling Index 1.1.

 


View larger version (15K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 3 Remodeling Indices as determined by multidetector spiral computed tomography in 23 nonstenotic (mean: 1.3 ± 0.2) and 21 stenotic lesions (mean: 1.0 ± 0.2, p < 0.001). Large bars = mean value; thin bars = mean value ± SD.

 


View larger version (22K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 4 (A) Correlation of cross-sectional vessel areas in intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) and multidetector spiral computed tomography (MDCT) (n = 26, r2 = 0.77); (B) Bland-Altman analysis of the differences in cross-sectional vessel areas measured in MDCT and IVUS (mean difference: 1.2 ± 3.7 mm2). The dashed lines correspond to the mean difference ± 2 SD (–6.10 to –8.5 mm2); (C) correlation of Remodeling Indices (RI) in IVUS and MDCT (n = 13, r2 = 0.82).

 




 
  CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home

Advertisement