Advertisement






Click here for more guidelines.
CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home
     

J Am Coll Cardiol, 2004; 43:794-802, doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2003.10.035
© 2004 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lewis, E. F.
Right arrow Articles by Warner Stevenson, L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lewis, E. F.
Right arrow Articles by Warner Stevenson, L.

Frequency and impact of delayed decisions regarding heart transplantation on long-term outcomes in patients with advanced heart failure

Eldrin F. Lewis, MD, MPH*,*, Sui W. Tsang, BS*, James C. Fang, MD, FACC*, Gilbert H. Mudge, MD, FACC*, John A. Jarcho, MD, FACC*, Carol M. Flavell, MSN*, Anju Nohria, MD*, Michael M. Givertz, MD, FACC*, Gregory S. Couper, MD{dagger}, John G. Byrne, MD{dagger} and Lynne Warner Stevenson, MD, FACC*

* Cardiovascular Division, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
{dagger} Cardiovascular Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA



View larger version (18K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 1 Distribution of patients based on decisions made by the Transplant Committee at the time of initial evaluation, with the percentage of the total population listed in parentheses. The number (%) of patients who were listed and transplanted in each group are described. Patients listed within 10 days of evaluation were considered "early listed," and patients listed after 10 days following the evaluation were considered "delayed-listed."

 


View larger version (19K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 2 (A) Kaplan-Meier survival curves for all-cause mortality before and after transplantation in eligible patients (n = 95) stratified by the time of listing after the initial evaluation. Patients who are never listed have a trend toward better survival, compared with patients listed for a transplant (p = 0.06). Patients not listed early have survival similar to patients listed early for a transplant. (B) Kaplan-Meier survival curves for all-cause mortality, censoring patients at the time of transplantation, to depict pretransplant mortality in eligible patients stratified by the time of listing after the initial evaluation. There were no differences in survival between the patients not listed and the patients either listed early or late.

 


View larger version (36K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 3 Overall survival of patients with and without a transplant based on the initial decision of the Transplant Committee. Potentially eligible patients (hatched bars) had worse outcomes than eligible patients (solid bars) both with and without a transplant.

 


View larger version (18K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 4 Kaplan-Meier survival curves for all-cause mortality before and after transplantation in all patients (n = 214) stratified by the initial decision of the Transplant Committee. Eligible and deferred patients had better survival than patients who were potentially eligible or ineligible at the time of the initial evaluation.

 




 
  CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home

Advertisement