Advertisement






Click here for more guidelines.
CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home
     

J Am Coll Cardiol, 2004; 43:787-793, doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2003.08.058
© 2004 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Butler, J.
Right arrow Articles by Wilson, J. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Butler, J.
Right arrow Articles by Wilson, J. R.

Selection of patients for heart transplantationin the current era of heart failure therapy

Javed Butler, MD, MPH, FACC*{dagger}{ddagger}||¶,*, Ghazanfar Khadim, MD*, Kimberly M. Paul, MD§, Stacy F. Davis, MD*, Marvin W. Kronenberg, MD*, Don B. Chomsky, MD, Richard N. Pierson, III, MD# and John R. Wilson, MD*

* Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Medicine, Nashville, TennesseeUSA
{dagger} Center for Health Services Research, Nashville, TennesseeUSA
{ddagger} Center for Education and Research in Therapeutics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
§ Cardiology Division, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
|| Geriatric Research, Education, and Clinical Center, Nashville, TennesseeUSA
Medicine Service, Nashville Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
# Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University of Maryland, Baltimore, Maryland, USA



View larger version (13K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 1 Cumulative survival for patients in the past era and current era demonstrates a significantly better survival for patients in the current era. After an initial higher mortality rate after transplantation, overall one-year survival is comparable to medical therapy for patients in the current era and better than heart failure therapy in the past era.

 


View larger version (21K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 2 Improvement in one-year event-free survival was noted for patients in the current era of heart failure management for all peak exercise oxygen consumption (VO2) groups. Patients with a high-risk heart failure survival score (HFSS) showed the most improvement in survival. Survival for the intermediate-risk peak VO2 group was comparable to that after transplantation. Open bars = past era; solid bars = current era. *Vanderbilt Heart Failure Program. §One-year post-transplant survival. #United Network for Organ Sharing 1990 to 2000.

 


View larger version (20K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 3 One-year event-free survival in the current era for the intermediate-risk groups stratified by beta-blockers and defibrillator therapy shows survival in patients with both therapies simultaneously to be comparable to that after transplantation. p > 0.2 for peak exercise oxygen consumption (VO2) and p = 0.07 for heart failure survival score (HFSS). Open bars = no beta-blocker therapy; dotted bars = beta-blocker therapy; solid bars = beta-blocker and defibrillator therapy.

 


View larger version (21K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 4 Suggested algorithm for selection of patients for heart transplantation, using peak exercise oxygen consumption (VO2) and heart failure survival score.

 




 
  CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home

Advertisement