Advertisement






Click here for more guidelines.
CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home
     

J Am Coll Cardiol, 2004; 43:337-342, doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2003.08.045
© 2004 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lotfi, M.
Right arrow Articles by Seidelin, P. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lotfi, M.
Right arrow Articles by Seidelin, P. H.

Impact of delays to cardiac surgery after failed angioplasty and stenting

Mat Lotfi, MD*, Karen Mackie, RN*, Vladimir Dzavik, MD* and Peter H. Seidelin, MD*,*

* Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University Health Network, Toronto General Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada



View larger version (15K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 1 Lesion characteristics of patients who were referred for urgent coronary artery bypass surgery (UCABG) (white bars) versus patients not referred for UCABG (black bars). Total number of lesions in the UCABG group and the no-UCABG group were 68 and 8,604, respectively. * p < 0.05 for significant differences between groups.

 


View larger version (13K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 2 Number of patients referred for urgent coronary artery bypass graft categorized by the time to arrival to the operating room (OR) after referral.

 




 
  CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home

Advertisement