Advertisement






Click here for more guidelines.
CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home
     

J Am Coll Cardiol, 2004; 43:179-184, doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2003.07.042
© 2004 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kaiser, D. R.
Right arrow Articles by Bank, A. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kaiser, D. R.
Right arrow Articles by Bank, A. J.

Impaired brachial artery endothelium-dependent and -independent vasodilation in men with erectile dysfunction and no other clinical cardiovascular disease

Daniel R. Kaiser, PhD*, Kevin Billups, MD{dagger}, Carol Mason, NP*, Rebecca Wetterling, BS*, Jennifer L. Lundberg, MS* and Alan J. Bank, MD, FACC*,*

* St. Paul Heart Clinic, St. Paul, USA
{dagger} EpiCenter for Sexual Health and Medicine, St. Paul, Minnesota, USA



View larger version (12K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 1 Brachial artery flow-mediated vasodilation (FMV) was significantly reduced in erectile dysfunction patients (circles) versus normal control subjects (squares) over the whole time period (p = 0.014). The difference was also significant when comparing the percent dilation from baseline to 60 s after cuff release (p = 0.05). * denotes a significant increase compared to erectile dysfunction over the entire curve.

 


View larger version (12K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 2 The vasodilator response to 0.4 mg sublingual nitroglycerin (NTG) was significantly impaired in erectile dysfunction (ED) patients versus normal control subjects (13.0 ± 1.4% vs. 17.8 ± 1.4%, p = 0.02). * denotes a significant decrease compared to normal.

 


View larger version (14K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 3 There was a significant correlation between endothelium-dependent (flow-mediated vasodilation) and -independent (nitroglycerin [NTG]) vasodilation in erectile dysfunction patients (circles) (r = 0.59, p < 0.05) but not in normal control subjects (squares) (r = 0.05, p = NS).

 




 
  CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home

Advertisement