Advertisement






Click here for more guidelines.
CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home
     

J Am Coll Cardiol, 2004; 43:2153-2159, doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2003.12.057
© 2004 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Waters, R. E.
Right arrow Articles by Granger, C. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Waters, R. E., II
Right arrow Articles by Granger, C. B.

Rationale and strategies for implementing community-based transfer protocols for primary percutaneous coronary intervention for acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction

Richard E. Waters, II, MD*, Kanwar P. Singh, MD*, Matthew T. Roe, MD, MHS, FACC*,*, Mat Lotfi, MD*, Michael H. Sketch, Jr, MD, FACC*, Kenneth W. Mahaffey, MD, FACC*, L. Kristin Newby, MD, MHS, FACC*, John H. Alexander, MD, MHS, FACC*, Robert A. Harrington, MD, FACC*, Robert M. Califf, MD, FACC* and Christopher B. Granger, MD, FACC*

* Duke University Medical Center and Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, North Carolina, USA



View larger version (21K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 1 Mortality to 30 days for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction patients treated with primary percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) versus fibrinolytic therapy (lytic). Reproduced with permission from the Primary Coronary Angioplasty Trialists' (PCAT) Collaborators (1). CI = confidence interval; SK = streptokinase; tPA = tissue plasminogen activator.

 


View larger version (16K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 2 Meta-analysis of short-term clinical outcomes in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction patients treated with onsite fibrinolysis versus transfer for primary percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA). Reproduced with permission from Keeley et al. (5).

 


View larger version (18K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 3 Mortality rates in clinical trials comparing onsite fibrinolysis (open bars) versus transfer for primary percutaneous coronary intervention (solid bars) for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. This figure is based on data presented by Keeley et al. (5). AIR-PAMI = Air Primary Angioplasty in Myocardial Infarction trial (12); DANAMI = Danish Multicenter Randomized Trial on Thrombolytic Therapy Versus Acute Coronary Angioplasty in Acute Myocardial Infarction trial (9); LIMI = Limburg Intervention/MI trial (13); PCI = percutaneous coronary intervention; PRAGUE = Primary Angioplasty After Transport of Patients From General Community Hospitals to Catheterization Units With/Without Emergency Thrombolysis Infusion Trials (10,11).

 




 
  CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home

Advertisement