Advertisement






Click here for more guidelines.
CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home
     

J Am Coll Cardiol, 2004; 43:2091-2096, doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2004.01.046
© 2004 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Zamorano, J.
Right arrow Articles by Lang, R. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Zamorano, J.
Right arrow Articles by Lang, R. M.

Real-time three-dimensional echocardiography for rheumatic mitral valve stenosis evaluation

An accurate and novel approach

José Zamorano, MD*,*, Pedro Cordeiro, MD*, Lissa Sugeng, MD{dagger}, Leopoldo Perez de Isla, MD*, Lynn Weinert, MD{dagger}, Carlos Macaya, MD*, Enrique Rodríguez, MD* and Roberto M. Lang, MD{dagger}

* Echocardiography Laboratory, Hospital Clínico San Carlos, Madrid, Spain
{dagger} University Hospital of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA



View larger version (167K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 1 Mitral valve orifice. Figure shows the accurate way that real-time three-dimensional echocardiography provides orientation of the mitral valvular orifice in the three planes of space and a measurement of mitral valve orifice.

 


View larger version (28K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 2 Bland-Altman graphs displaying differences against average values between traditional noninvasive and real-time three-dimensional (RT3D)-determined mitral valvular area. The thick line represents mean difference, and the thin lines represent the limits of agreement (all measurements in cm2). PHT = pressure half-time; PISA = proximal isovelocity surface area; 2D = two-dimensional echocardiography.

 


View larger version (15K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 3 Bland-Altman graphs displaying differences against average values between noninvasive and Gorlin-determined mitral valvular area. The thick line represents mean difference, and the thin lines represent the limits of agreement (all measurements in cm2). PHT = pressure half-time; PISA = proximal isovelocity surface area; RT3D = real-time three-dimensional echocardiography; 2D = two-dimensional echocardiography.

 




 
  CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home

Advertisement