Advertisement






Click here for more guidelines.
CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home
     

J Am Coll Cardiol, 2003; 42:1656-1662, doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2003.06.002
© 2003 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pleiner, J.
Right arrow Articles by Wolzt, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Pleiner, J.
Right arrow Articles by Wolzt, M.

Inflammation-induced vasoconstrictorhyporeactivity is caused by oxidative stress

Johannes Pleiner, MD*, Friedrich Mittermayer, MD*, Georg Schaller, MD*, Claudia Marsik, MD*, Raymond J. MacAllister, MD, FRCP{dagger} and Michael Wolzt, MD*,*

* Department of Clinical Pharmacology, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
{dagger} Centre for Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Department of Medicine, University College London, London, United Kingdom



View larger version (23K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 1 Forearm blood flow (FBF) dose–response curves to norepinephrine (NE, upper panel), angiotensin II (ANG II, middle panel), and vasopressin (VP, lower panel) at baseline and after administration of LPS (closed symbols) or placebo (open symbols). The response to vasoconstrictors was attenuated after LPS. The FBF ratio (intervention vs. control arm, baseline defined as 100%) is expressed as mean ± SEM. n = 9; *p < 0.05 between groups, repeated measures ANOVA and Bonferroni corrected t tests.

 


View larger version (18K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 2 Vasoconstriction to norepinephrine at baseline (open symbols) and 4 h after LPS, with co-infusion of placebo (closed symbols, upper panel) or vitamin C (closed symbols, lower panel) on two different study days. The FBF ratio (intervention vs. control arm, baseline defined as 100%) is expressed as mean ± SEM. n = 8; *p < 0.05 between groups, repeated measures ANOVA and Bonferroni corrected t tests.

 


View larger version (19K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 3 Vasoconstriction to angiotensin II at baseline (open symbols) and 4 h after LPS, with co-infusion of placebo (closed symbols, upper panel) or vitamin C (closed symbols, lower panel) on two different study days. The FBF ratio (intervention vs. control arm, baseline defined as 100%) is expressed as mean ± SEM. n = 8; *p < 0.05 between groups, ANOVA and Bonferroni corrected t tests.

 




 
  CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home

Advertisement